Understanding the Return of Genomic Sequencing Results Process: Content Review of Participant Summary Letters in the eMERGE Research Network

Author:

Lynch JohnORCID,Sharp RichardORCID,Aufox Sharon,Bland SarahORCID,Blout Carrie,Bowen Deborah,Buchanan Adam,Halverson Colin,Harr Margaret,Hebbring Scott,Henrikson Nora,Hoell Christin,Holm IngridORCID,Jarvik Gail,Kullo Iftikhar,Kochan David,Larson Eric,Lazzeri Amanda,Leppig Kathleen,Madden Jill,Marasa Maddalena,Myers Melanie,Peterson Josh,Prows Cynthia,Kulchak Rahm Alanna,Ralston James,Milo Rasouly HilaORCID,Scrol Aaron,Smith MaureenORCID,Sturm Amy,Stuttgen KelseyORCID,Wiesner Georgia,Williams Marc,Wynn Julia,Williams JanetORCID

Abstract

A challenge in returning genomic test results to research participants is how best to communicate complex and clinically nuanced findings to participants in a manner that is scalable to the large numbers of participants enrolled. The purpose of this study was to examine the features of genetic results letters produced at each Electronic Medical Records and Genomics (eMERGE3) Network site to assess their readability and content. Letters were collected from each site, and a qualitative analysis of letter content and a quantitative analysis of readability statistics were performed. Because letters were produced independently at each eMERGE site, significant heterogeneity in readability and content was found. The content of letters varied widely from a baseline of notifying participants that results existed to more detailed information about positive or negative results, as well as materials for sharing with family members. Most letters were significantly above the Centers for Disease Control-suggested reading level for health communication. While continued effort should be applied to make letters easier to understand, the ongoing challenge of explaining complex genomic information, the implications of negative test results, and the uncertainty that comes with some types of test and result makes simplifying letter text challenging.

Funder

National Human Genome Research Institute

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Medicine (miscellaneous)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3