Affiliation:
1. Department of Cultures, Politics and Society, University of Turin, 10124 Torino, Italy
Abstract
This article dialogues with “yoga studies” and the social scientific study of religion (e.g., the sociology of religion and religious studies), arguing that both substantially neglect a thorough discussion of scholars’ engagement in the field despite being largely composed by “scholar–practitioners”. This is problematic from a methodological point of view as well as from an ethical perspective. Moving in the interstices between biographical reflections, critical social theory and methodological notes on embodied ethnographic research, I self-reflexively discuss my “shifting positionality” from devoted yoga practitioner to critical scholar, mapping the most significant turning points that I encountered during my research on the pedagogies of modern forms of yoga (2017–current). In so doing, I also discuss my overall positioning, participation and ethical reflections in relation to the main object of inquiry of my research. From this, I posit that the positions of scholar and practitioner are, at least in some cases, incommensurable, while the scholar–practitioner may also foster a unique way of knowing based on reflexivity as a living engagement and on the linkages between theory and practice from which there is much to gain.
Reference75 articles.
1. Bourdieu, P., and Wacquant, L.J.D. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, The University of Chicago Press.
2. Di Stefano, A., Rudestam, K.E., and Silverman., R.J. (2004). Encylopedia of Distributed Learning, Sage.
3. Bourdieu, P. (1984). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste, Routledge.
4. Positionality: Identity, Standpoint and the Limits (and Possibilities) of Fieldwork;Selka;Fieldwork Relig.,2022
5. The Development of Modern Yoga: A Survey of the Field;Newcombe;Relig. Compass,2009
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献