A Comprehensive Review of Machine Learning Approaches for Anomaly Detection in Smart Homes: Experimental Analysis and Future Directions
-
Published:2024-04-19
Issue:4
Volume:16
Page:139
-
ISSN:1999-5903
-
Container-title:Future Internet
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Future Internet
Author:
Rahman Md Motiur1ORCID, Gupta Deepti2ORCID, Bhatt Smriti3ORCID, Shokouhmand Shiva1ORCID, Faezipour Miad1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. School of Engineering Technology, Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA 2. Subhani Department of Computer Information Systems, Texas A&M University-Central Texas, Killeen, TX 76549, USA 3. Department of Computer & Information Technology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
Abstract
Detecting anomalies in human activities is increasingly crucial today, particularly in nuclear family settings, where there may not be constant monitoring of individuals’ health, especially the elderly, during critical periods. Early anomaly detection can prevent from attack scenarios and life-threatening situations. This task becomes notably more complex when multiple ambient sensors are deployed in homes with multiple residents, as opposed to single-resident environments. Additionally, the availability of datasets containing anomalies representing the full spectrum of abnormalities is limited. In our experimental study, we employed eight widely used machine learning and two deep learning classifiers to identify anomalies in human activities. We meticulously generated anomalies, considering all conceivable scenarios. Our findings reveal that the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU) excels in accurately classifying normal and anomalous activities, while the naïve Bayes classifier demonstrates relatively poor performance among the ten classifiers considered. We conducted various experiments to assess the impact of different training–test splitting ratios, along with a five-fold cross-validation technique, on the performance. Notably, the GRU model consistently outperformed all other classifiers under both conditions. Furthermore, we offer insights into the computational costs associated with these classifiers, encompassing training and prediction phases. Extensive ablation experiments conducted in this study underscore that all these classifiers can effectively be deployed for anomaly detection in two-resident homes.
Reference52 articles.
1. Bakar, U.A.B.U.A., Ghayvat, H., Hasanm, S.F., and Mukhopadhyay, S.C. (2016). Activity and Anomaly Detection in Smart Home: A Survey, Springer International Publishing. 2. Ramapatruni, S., Narayanan, S.N., Mittal, S., Joshi, A., and Joshi, K. (2019, January 27–29). Anomaly Detection Models for Smart Home Security. Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE 5th Intl Conference on Big Data Security on Cloud (BigDataSecurity), IEEE International Conference on High Performance and Smart Computing, (HPSC) and IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Data and Security (IDS), Washington, DC, USA. 3. Rahim, A., Zhong, Y., Ahmad, T., Ahmad, S., Pławiak, P., and Hammad, M. (2023). Enhancing Smart Home Security: Anomaly Detection and Face Recognition in Smart Home IoT Devices Using Logit-Boosted CNN Models. Sensors, 23. 4. A Hybrid Intrusion Detection System for Smart Home Security Based on Machine Learning and User Behavior;Alghayadh;Adv. Internet Things,2021 5. Malaisé, A., Maurice, P., Colas, F., Charpillet, F., and Ivaldi, S. (2018, January 25–29). Activity Recognition with Multiple Wearable Sensors for Industrial Applications. Proceedings of the ACHI 2018—Eleventh International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, Rome, Italy.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|