Comparison of the Effectiveness of Drag Reduction Devices on a Simplified Truck Model through Numerical Simulation

Author:

Charles Terrance,Yang ZhiyinORCID

Abstract

The aerodynamic efficiency of trucks is very low because of their non-streamlined box shape, which is subject to practical constraints, leaving little room for improvement in terms of aerodynamic efficiency. Hence, other means of improving the aerodynamic efficiency of trucks are needed, and one practical yet relatively simple method to reduce aerodynamic drag is deploying drag reduction devices on trucks. This paper describes a numerical study of flow over a simplified truck with drag reduction devices. The numerical approach employed was Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS). Four test cases with different drag reduction devices deployed around the tractor–trailer gap region were studied. The effectiveness of those drag reduction devices was assessed, and it was demonstrated that in all four cases, the aerodynamic drag was reduced compared with the baseline case without any drag reduction devices. The most effective device was case 4 (about 24% reduction), with a roof deflector, side extenders, and five cross-flow vortex trap devices (CVTDs). Flow field analysis was performed to shed light on drag reduction mechanisms, which confirmed our previous findings that the main reason for the drag reduction was the reduced pressure on the front face of the trailer, while the reduction in the turbulence level in the tractor–trailer gap region contributed much less to the overall drag reduction.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Multidisciplinary

Reference24 articles.

1. Bluff body flow research with application to road vehicles;Bearman,2009

2. On-road evaluation of devices to reduce heavy truck aerodynamic drag;Schoon;Proceedings of the SAE 2007 Commercial Vehicle Engineering Congress & Exhibition,2007

3. Aerodynamics of Heavy Vehicles

4. Development of active flow control for trucks;Minelli;Proceedings of the 3rd Thermal and Fluids Engineering Conference (TFEC),2018

5. Impacts of the gap size between two bluff bodies on the flow field within the gap;Charles;Proceedings of the 13th International Conference in Heat Transfer, Fluid Mechanics and Thermodynamics,2017

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3