The Evaluation of Green Building’s Feasibility: Comparative Analysis across Different Geological Conditions

Author:

McKenna Jessica1,Harris Sophia1,Heinrich Kris2,Stewart Taylor2,Gharehbaghi Koorosh3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Lendlease, Level 9, One Melbourne Quarter, 699 Collins Street Docklands, Melbourne 3008, Australia

2. BUILT ENVIRONS, 161 Wakefield St, Adelaide 5000, Australia

3. School of Property, Construction and Project Management, RMIT University, Melbourne 3000, Australia

Abstract

Green building materials have nontoxic properties and are made from recycled materials. This means they are, in most cases, created from renewable resources in comparison to non-renewable resources. This research aims to further improve the justification of green buildings and their materials. This is undertaken to determine the validity of such construction techniques. This research utilizes both qualitative and quantitative methods through five Australian case studies. The case studies, which are based on new and redeveloped structures, are selected via different geological locations and are evaluated via logical argumentation along with correlation research. Further, the research will address the problem by identifying a variety of green building materials that can be used to substitute non-green building materials. With careful comparisons among the five buildings, the green signs and implementation advantages and disadvantages will be evaluated. The result of this comparison will assist in improving the current education around the topic of green building and benefit the overall response to positive change within the construction industry. Although green building initiatives are not difficult to apply, they can be cost efficient. To maximize their cost efficiency, these initiatives need to be fully adopted. This includes the adaptation of specific building orientation, design, and sealing off penetrations to greatly improve passive heating and cooling. Further, the use of rainwater tanks also assists with energy efficiency by reducing the amount of mains water used. The utilization of natural lighting along with an advanced solar power system would further reduce the overall energy usage.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Earth and Planetary Sciences

Reference45 articles.

1. Green Building Council of Australia (2023, May 15). What is Green Building?. Available online: https://www.gbca.org.au/about/what-is-green-building.

2. Green Wall Australia (2022). Custom Greenwalls, Green Wall Australia.

3. Ching, F., and Ian, M.F. (2014). Green Building Illustrated, Wiley.

4. Sustainable construction—The role of environmental assessment tools;Ding;J. Environ. Manag.,2008

5. Spiegel, R., and Meadows, D. (2012). Green Building Materials: A Guide to Product Selection and Specification, Wiley.

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3