Affiliation:
1. Institute of Sociology of the Czech Academy of Sciences, Jilská, 110 00 Praha, Czech Republic
Abstract
As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many public institutions in Europe designed policies that increased the use of ICTs with the public to provide or collect information, offer support, and perform educational activities. This process was in line with a sociotechnical imaginary where people’s lives are increasingly “smart” and enhanced through digital innovation. We provide an analysis of the implications of this imaginary during the pandemic for people belonging to vulnerable categories, to understand how these actors are considered in the digital transition process at the European level. This analysis is based on qualitative data collected in 30 European countries in the frame of an EU project aimed at understanding how COVID-19-related public policies shaped social inequalities. Building on the intersection between gender studies, science and technology studies, and media studies, this analysis aims to contribute to a more inequality-aware policy reflection on the digital transition.
Funder
European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme
Reference73 articles.
1. Jasanoff, S., and Kim, S.-H. (2015). Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power, University of Chicago Press.
2. Burnett, J., Senker, P., and Walker, K. (2009). The Myths of Technology: Innovation and Inequality, Peter Lang Inc., International Academic Publishers.
3. Mosco, V. (2004). The Digital Sublime: Myth Power and Cyberspace, MIT.
4. The Myths of E-Government: Looking Beyond the Assumptions of a New and Better Government;Bekkers;Inf. Soc.,2007
5. Morozov, E. (2013). To Save Everything, Click Here: Technology, Solutionism and the Urge to Fix Problems That Don’t Exist, Allen Lane.