Accuracy of a Smartwatch to Assess Heart Rate Monitoring and Atrial Fibrillation in Stroke Patients

Author:

Meza Claudia123ORCID,Juega Jesus123,Francisco Jaume24,Santos Alba24ORCID,Duran Laura4ORCID,Rodriguez Maite12,Alvarez-Sabin Jose1,Sero Laia5,Ustrell Xavier5ORCID,Bashir Saima67,Serena Joaquín67ORCID,Silva Yolanda67,Molina Carlos12,Pagola Jorge123ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Stroke Unit, Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain

2. Vall d’Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), 08035 Barcelona, Spain

3. Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Hospital Vall d’Hebron, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain

4. Arrhythmia Unit, Department of Cardiology, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron, 08035 Barcelona, Spain

5. Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari Joan XXIII, 43005 Tarragona, Spain

6. Cerebrovascular Pathology Research Group, Girona Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBGI), 17790 Girona, Spain

7. Department of Neurology, Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. JosepTrueta, 17007 Girona, Spain

Abstract

(1) Background: Consumer smartwatches may be a helpful tool to screen for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, validation studies on older stroke patients remain scarce. The aim of this pilot study from RCT NCT05565781 was to validate the resting heart rate (HR) measurement and the irregular rhythm notification (IRN) feature in stroke patients in sinus rhythm (SR) and AF. (2) Methods: Resting clinical HR measurements (every 5 min) were assessed using continuous bedside ECG monitoring (CEM) and the Fitbit Charge 5 (FC5). IRNs were gathered after at least 4 h of CEM. Lin’s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC), Bland-Altman analysis, and mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) were used for agreement and accuracy assessment. (3) Results: In all, 526 individual pairs of measurements were obtained from 70 stroke patients—age 79.4 years (SD ± 10.2), 63% females, BMI 26.3 (IQ 22.2–30.5), and NIHSS score 8 (IQR 1.5–20). The agreement between the FC5 and CEM was good (CCC 0.791) when evaluating paired HR measurements in SR. Meanwhile, the FC5 provided weak agreement (CCC 0.211) and low accuracy (MAPE 16.48%) when compared to CEM recordings in AF. Regarding the accuracy of the IRN feature, analysis found a low sensitivity (34%) and high specificity (100%) for detecting AF. (4) Conclusion: The FC5 was accurate at assessing the HR during SR, but the accuracy during AF was poor. In contrast, the IRN feature was acceptable for guiding decisions regarding AF screening in stroke patients.

Funder

Instituto de Salud Carlos III and the European Union

eHealth Center of the Universitat Oberta de Catalunya

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Biochemistry,Instrumentation,Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics,Analytical Chemistry

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3