Affiliation:
1. The Second Clinical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510405, China
2. Department of Critical Care Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou 510120, China
Abstract
Both low and high glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels are well-established causal risk factors for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in the general population and diabetic patients. However, the relationship between HbA1c with all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among patients with hypertension is unclear. We used NHANES data from 1999 to 2014 as the basis for this population-based cohort study. Based on HbA1c levels (HbA1c > 5, HbA1c > 5.5, HbA1c > 6, HbA1c > 6.5, HbA1c > 7%), hypertensive patients were divided into five groups. An analysis of multivariable Cox proportional hazards was conducted based on hazard ratios (HRs) and respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The relationship between HbA1c and mortality was further explored using Kaplan–Meier survival curves, restricted cubic spline curves, and subgroup analyses. In addition, 13,508 patients with hypertension (average age 58.55 ± 15.56 years) were included in the present analysis, with 3760 (27.84%) all-cause deaths during a follow-up of 127.69 ± 57.9 months. A U-shaped relationship was found between HbA1c and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality (all p for likelihood ratio tests were 0.0001). The threshold value of HbA1c related to the lowest risk for all-cause and cardiovascular mortality was 5.3% and 5.7%, respectively. Below the threshold value, increased HbA1c levels reduced the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.51–0.90, p = 0.0078) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.57–1.05, p = 0.0969). Inversely, above the threshold value, increased HbA1c levels accelerated the risk of all-cause mortality (HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.11–1.18, p < 0.0001) and cardiovascular mortality (HR 1.22, 95% CI 1.16–1.29, p < 0.0001). In conclusion, A U-shape relationship was observed between HbA1c and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality among hypertensive patients.
Funder
National Natural Scientific Foundation
Research Fund for Zhaoyang Talents of Guangdong Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine
Specific Research Fund for TCM Science and Technology of Guangzhou Provincial Hospital of Chinese Medicine
Reference28 articles.
1. Collaborators GBDRF (2018). Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 84 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet, 392, 1923–1994.
2. 2020 International Society of Hypertension Global Hypertension Practice Guidelines;Unger;Hypertension,2020
3. Hypertension and Diabetes Mellitus: Coprediction and Time Trajectories;Tsimihodimos;Hypertension,2018
4. Exploration and Validation of the Performance of Hemoglobin A1c in Detecting Diabetes in Community-Dwellers with Hypertension;Qiu;Ann. Lab. Med.,2020
5. Diabetes, Hypertension, and Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Insights and Vascular Mechanisms;Petrie;Can. J. Cardiol.,2018
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献