Enzymatic Debridement in Geriatric Burn Patients—A Reliable Option for Selective Eschar Removal

Author:

Tapking Christian1,Rontoyanni Victoria G.2ORCID,Diehm Yannick F.1ORCID,Strübing Felix1ORCID,Solimani Farzan34,Bigdeli Amir K.1ORCID,Hundeshagen Gabriel1,Fischer Sebastian1,Kneser Ulrich1ORCID,Siegwart Laura C.1

Affiliation:

1. Department of Hand, Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Microsurgery, Burn Center, BG Klinik Ludwigshafen, University of Heidelberg, 67071 Ludwigshafen, Germany

2. Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555, USA

3. Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, 10099 Berlin, Germany

4. Berlin Institute of Health at Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, BIH Biomedical Innovation Academy, BIH Charité Clinician Scientist Program, 10178 Berlin, Germany

Abstract

The treatment of geriatric burn patients represents a major challenge in burn care. The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of enzymatic debridement (ED) in geriatric burn patients. Adult patients who received ED for treatment of mixed pattern and full thickness burns (August 2017–October 2022) were included in this study and grouped in the younger (18–65 years) and geriatric (≥65 years) groups. Primary outcome was a necessity of surgery subsequent to ED. Both groups (patient characteristics, surgical and non-surgical treatment) were compared. Multiple logistic and linear regression models were used to identify the effect of age on the outcomes. A total of 169 patients were included (younger group: 135 patients, geriatric group: 34 patients). The burn size as indicated by %TBSA (24.2 ± 20.4% vs. 26.8 ± 17.1%, p = 0.499) was similar in both groups. The ASA (2.5 ± 1.1 vs. 3.4 ± 1.1, p < 0.001) and ABSI scores (6.1 ± 2.8 vs. 8.6 ± 2.3, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the geriatric group. The %TBSA treated with ED (5.4 ± 5.0% vs. 4.4 ± 4.3%, p = 0.245) were similar in both groups. The necessity of additional surgical interventions (63.0 % vs. 58.8 %, p = 0.763) and the wound size debrided and grafted (2.9 ± 3.5% vs. 2.2 ± 2.1%; p = 0.301) were similar in both groups. Regression models yielded that age did not have an effect on efficacy of ED. We showed that ED is reliable and safe to use in geriatric patients. Age did not have a significant influence on the surgical outcomes of ED. In both groups, the size of the grafted area was reduced and, in many patients, surgery was avoided completely.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference33 articles.

1. World Health Organization (2022). Aging and Heath Fact Sheet, WHO.

2. Trauma in elderly patients: A study of prevalence, comorbidities and gender differences;Murabito;Il G. Di Chir.,2018

3. Pathophysiologic Response to Burns in the Elderly;Jeschke;eBioMedicine,2015

4. Management of burns in the elderly;Chahine;Ann. Burn. Fire Disasters,2016

5. Outcomes of burns in the elderly: Revised estimates from the Birmingham Burn Centre;Wearn;Burns,2015

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3