Median Nerve Stimulation for Treatment of Tics: Randomized, Controlled, Crossover Trial

Author:

Iverson Ann M.1ORCID,Arbuckle Amanda L.2ORCID,Ueda Keisuke3ORCID,Song David Y.4ORCID,Bihun Emily C.2,Koller Jonathan M.2ORCID,Wallendorf Michael5,Black Kevin J.6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Washington University School of Medicine, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

2. Department of Psychiatry, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

3. Department of Neurology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

4. University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY 14642, USA

5. Division of Biostatistics, Institute for Informatics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

6. Departments of Psychiatry, Neurology, Radiology, and Neuroscience, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA

Abstract

A prior study showed that rhythmic, but not arrhythmic, 12 Hz stimulation of the median nerve (MNS) entrained the sensorimotor cortex EEG signal and found that 10 Hz MNS improved tics in Tourette syndrome (TS). However, no control condition was tested, and stimulation blocks lasted only 1 min. We set out to replicate the TS results and to test whether tic improvement occurs by the proposed cortical entrainment mechanism. Preregistration was completed at ClinicalTrials.gov, under number NCT04731714. Thirty-two people with TS, age 15–64, completed two study visits with repeated MNS on and off blocks in random order, one visit for rhythmic and one for arrhythmic MNS. Subjects and staff were blind to order; a video rater was additionally blind to stimulation and to the order of visits and blocks. Rhythmic MNS at 10 Hz improved tics. Both rhythmic and arrhythmic 12 Hz MNS improved tic frequency, intensity, and urges, but the two treatments did not differ significantly. Participant masking was effective, and there was no carryover effect. Several participants described a dramatic benefit. Discomfort was minimal. There was no evidence that the MNS benefit persisted after stimulation ended. These results replicate the tic benefit from MNS but show that the EEG entrainment hypothesis cannot explain that benefit. Another electrophysiological mechanism may explain the benefit; alternatively, these data do not exclude a placebo effect.

Funder

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences

Washington University

Siteman Comprehensive Cancer Center

NCI Cancer Center

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3