Comparison of SWAT and MODIS Evapotranspiration Data for Multiple Timescales

Abstract

Evapotranspiration (ET) provides important information for hydrological studies, including estimating plant water requirements which can be derived from remote sensing data or simulated using hydrological models. In this study, ET derived from the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectrometer (MODIS) was compared with ET simulated by the calibrated and validated Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model for the Big Sunflower River watershed (BSRW) in Mississippi. The comparisons were made based on 8-day, 1-month, seasonal, and annual timescales. The coefficients of variation (COVs) for the 8-day, 1-month, seasonal, and annual ET simulated by SWAT were 0.42, 0.40, 0.32, and 0.04, respectively, whereas the COVs for the ET derived from MODIS were 0.06, 0.12, 0.08, and 0.01 for the respective time scales. Lower COVs for the ET derived from MODIS indicated lower sensitivity to crop growth in the field. SWAT-simulated ET was the highest during crop growing season and lowest during dormant season, but MODIS-derived ET did not vary considerably according to crop growing or harvesting seasons. As MODIS-derived ET accounts for only climatic conditions and vegetation cover, SWAT-simulated ET is recommended for the short-term estimation of crop water requirements because it accounts for climatic, land use, soil, and slope conditions.