Streamflow Trends in Central Chile

Author:

Sangüesa Claudia12ORCID,Pizarro Roberto1234,Ingram Ben5ORCID,Balocchi Francisco6ORCID,García-Chevesich Pablo78,Pino Juan9ORCID,Ibáñez Alfredo12,Vallejos Carlos1ORCID,Mendoza Romina3,Bernal Alejandra1,Valdés-Pineda Rodrigo1011ORCID,Pérez Felipe12

Affiliation:

1. UNESCO Chair Surface Hydrology, University of Talca, Talca 3467769, Chile

2. Centro Nacional de Excelencia para la Industria de la Madera (CENAMAD), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7810128, Chile

3. Instituto Interdisciplinario para la Innovación, Universidad de Talca, Talca 3467769, Chile

4. Facultad de Ciencias Forestales y de la Conservación de la Naturaleza, Universidad de Chile, La Pintana, Santiago 8820808, Chile

5. School of Water, Energy and Environment, Cranfield University, Cranfield MK43 0AL, UK

6. Ecosystems, Productivity and Climate Change, Bioforest SA, Camino a Coronel km 15, Coronel 4130000, Chile

7. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO 80401, USA

8. Intergovernmental Hydrological Programme, UNESCO, Montevideo 11200, Uruguay

9. Dirección de Transferencia Tecnológica, Universidad Tecnológica Metropolitana, Santiago 8330367, Chile

10. Piteau Associates, Water Management Group, 2500 North Tucson Boulevard, Suite 100, Tucson, AZ 85716, USA

11. Department of Hydrology and Atmospheric Sciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721, USA

12. Dirección General de Aguas, Ministerio de Obras Públicas, Santiago 8340652, Chile

Abstract

The availability of water in Chile has shown signs of decline in recent decades. This is problematic because Chile’s economy depends on mining, forestry, and agricultural activities, all limited by the availability of water resources. In this study, daily, monthly and annual flows in 31 basins located in the arid–semiarid zones (29°12′ S–33°58′ S) and in the humid–subhumid zones (34°43′ S–38°30′ S) of Chile were evaluated using the Mann–Kendall trend test and the quantile–Kendall procedure during three periods: 1984–2021 (31 stations), 1975–2021 (20 stations), and 1969–2021 (18 stations). Results showed that, at the annual level, trends were predominantly negative in both climatic zones and over the three periods analyzed. In the arid–semiarid zone, a higher frequency of annual significant negative trends was found in maximum flows in 1969–2021 and 1975–2021, compared to the last period under study. The humid–subhumid zone showed significant annual negative trends in all series analyzed. At the monthly level, on the other hand, the arid-semiarid zone showed a decrease in significant negative trends as the number of years analyzed increased, for all flow types. The humid–subhumid zone did not indicate a similar defined pattern. Likewise, the quantile–Kendall procedure showed a reduction in the significant trends as the length of the time series was increased in the arid-semiarid zone, but no such pattern was observed in the humid–subhumid zone. Furthermore, a relationship was observed for the PDO and the summer month flows for both zones. Consequently, it is concluded that the flow trends are generally negative, and their statistical significance depends on the period studied.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Oceanography

Reference40 articles.

1. Core Writing Team, Pachauri, R.K., and Meyer, L.A. (2014). Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, IPCC.

2. Evolution of Land Surface Air Temperature Trend;Ji;Nat. Clim. Chang.,2014

3. Possible Artifacts of Data Biases in the Recent Global Surface Warming Hiatus;Karl;Science,2015

4. Influencia del Cambio Climático en el Comportamiento de los Caudales Máximos en la Zona Mediterránea de Chile;Pizarro;Tecnol. Cienc. Agua,2013

5. Cambio Climático Global y Eventuales Procesos en Chile;Fuenzalida;Rev. Ambiente Desarro.,1989

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3