Channel Morphology Change after Restoration: Drone Laser Scanning versus Traditional Surveying Techniques

Author:

Resop Jonathan P.1ORCID,Hendrix Coral2,Wynn-Thompson Theresa2ORCID,Hession W. Cully2

Affiliation:

1. Department of Geographical Sciences, University of Maryland, College Park, MD 20740, USA

2. Department of Biological Systems Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA 24060, USA

Abstract

Accurate and precise measures of channel morphology are important when monitoring a stream post-restoration to determine changes in stability, water quality, and aquatic habitat availability. Practitioners often rely on traditional surveying methods such as a total station for measuring channel metrics (e.g., cross-sectional area, width, depth, and slope). However, these methods have limitations in terms of coarse sampling densities and time-intensive field efforts. Drone-based lidar or drone laser scanning (DLS) provides much higher resolution point clouds and has the potential to improve post-restoration monitoring efforts. For this study, a 1.3-km reach of Stroubles Creek (Blacksburg, VA, USA), which underwent a restoration in 2010, was surveyed twice with a total station (2010 and 2021) and twice with DLS (2017 and 2021). The initial restoration was divided into three treatment reaches: T1 (livestock exclusion), T2 (livestock exclusion and bank treatment), and T3 (livestock exclusion, bank treatment, and inset floodplain). Cross-sectional channel morphology metrics were extracted from the 2021 DLS scan and compared to metrics calculated from the 2021 total station survey. DLS produced 6.5 times the number of cross sections over the study reach and 8.8 times the number of points per cross section compared to the total station. There was good agreement between the metrics derived from both surveying methods, such as channel width (R2 = 0.672) and cross-sectional area (R2 = 0.597). As a proof of concept to demonstrate the advantage of DLS over traditional surveying, 0.1 m digital terrain models (DTMs) were generated from the DLS data. Based on the drone lidar data, from 2017 to 2021, treatment reach T3 showed the most stability, in terms of the least change and variability in cross-sectional metrics as well as the least erosion area and volume per length of reach.

Funder

Virginia Agricultural Experiment Station

U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference67 articles.

1. Synthesizing U.S. River Restoration Efforts;Bernhardt;Science,2005

2. Wheeler, T.B. (2023, June 11). Stream Restoration Techniques Draw Pushback. Available online: https://www.bayjournal.com/news/pollution/stream-restoration-techniques-draw-pushback/article_ffc96960-0895-11eb-b36f-efa466158524.html.

3. Design for Stream Restoration;Shields;J. Hydraul. Eng.,2003

4. Doll, B.A., Grabow, G.L., Hall, K.R., Halley, J., Harman, W.A., Jennings, G.D., and Wise, D.E. (2003). Stream Restoration: A Natural Channel Design Handbook, NC Stream Restoration Institute, NC State University.

5. Hydraulic Analysis of River Training Cross-Vanes as Part of Post-Restoration Monitoring;Endreny;Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.,2011

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3