Impacts of Max-Stable Process Areal Exceedance Calculations to Study Area Sampling Density, Surface Network Precipitation Gage Extent and Density, and Model Fitting Method

Author:

Skahill Brian1ORCID,Smith Cole Haden2,Russell Brook T.3,England John F.2

Affiliation:

1. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180, USA

2. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Institute for Water Resources, Risk Management Center, Lakewood, CO 80228, USA

3. School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Clemson University, Clemson, SC 29634, USA

Abstract

Max-stable process (MSP) models can be fit to data collected over a spatial domain to estimate areal-based exceedances while accounting for spatial dependence in extremes. They have theoretical grounding within the framework of extreme value theory (EVT). In this work, we fit MSP models to three-day duration cool season precipitation maxima in the Willamette River Basin (WRB) of Oregon and to 48 h mid-latitude cyclone precipitation annual maxima in the Upper Trinity River Basin (TRB) of Texas. In total, 14 MSP models were fit (seven based on the WRB data and seven based on the TRB data). These MSP model fits were developed and applied to explore how user choices of study area sampling density, gage extent, and model fitting method impact areal precipitation-frequency calculations. The impacts of gage density were also evaluated. The development of each MSP involved the application of a recently introduced trend surface modeling methodology. Significant reductions in computing times were achieved, with little loss in accuracy, applying random sample subsets rather than the entire grid when calculating areal exceedances for the Cougar dam study area in the WRB. Explorations of gage extent revealed poor consistency among the TRB MSPs with modeling the generalized extreme value (GEV) marginal distribution scale parameter. The gauge density study revealed the robustness of the trend surface modeling methodology. Regardless of the fitting method, the final GEV shape parameter estimates for all fourteen MSPs were greater than their prescribed initial values which were obtained from spatial GEV fits that assumed independence among the extremes. When two MSP models only differed by their selected fitting method, notable differences were observed with their dependence and trend surface parameter estimates and resulting areal exceedances calculations.

Funder

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Risk Management Center

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Earth-Surface Processes,Waste Management and Disposal,Water Science and Technology,Oceanography

Reference87 articles.

1. National Research Council (1988). Estimating Probabilities of Extreme Floods: Methods and Recommended Research, National Academy Press.

2. Subcommittee on Hydrology Extreme Storm Events Work Group (2023, May 16). Extreme Rainfall Product Needs; Water Information Coordination Program, Advisory Committee on Water Information, U.S. Geological Survey Washington, D.C, Available online: https://acwi.gov/hydrology/extreme-storm/product_needs_proposal_20181010.pdf.

3. Skahill, B.E., Viglione, A., and Byrd, A.R. (2016). A Bayesian Analysis of the Flood Frequency Hydrology Concept, U.S. Army Engineer Research and Development Center Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory Technical Note CHETN-X-1. Available online: https://hdl.handle.net/11681/21563.

4. Smith, H. (2020). Verification of the Bayesian Estimation and Fitting Software (RMC-BestFit), U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Risk Management Center Technical Report RMC-TR-2020-02. Available online: https://www.iwrlibrary.us/#/document/6f34186c-813c-4fde-85d7-4395988fe607.

5. Smith, H., and Doughty, M. (2020). RMC-BestFit Quick Start Guide, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Risk Management Center Technical Report RMC-TR-2020-03. Available online: https://www.iwrlibrary.us/#/document/f1767e9f-714d-43b7-cf74-ed1bd65f9dd9.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3