Affiliation:
1. Departamento de Geodinámica, Estratigrafía y Paleontología, Facultad de Ciencias Geológicas, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, C/José Antonio Novais 12, 28040 Madrid, Spain
Abstract
Groundwater contamination poses a major challenge to water supplies around the world. Assessing groundwater vulnerability is crucial to protecting human livelihoods and the environment. This research explores a machine learning-based variation of the classic DRASTIC method to map groundwater vulnerability. Our approach is based on the application of a large number of tree-based machine learning algorithms to optimize DRASTIC’s parameter weights. This contributes to overcoming two major issues that are frequently encountered in the literature. First, we provide an evidence-based alternative to DRASTIC’s aprioristic approach, which relies on static ratings and coefficients. Second, the use of machine learning approaches to compute DRASTIC vulnerability maps takes into account the spatial distribution of groundwater contaminants, which is expected to improve the spatial outcomes. Despite offering moderate results in terms of machine learning metrics, the machine learning approach was more accurate in this case than a traditional DRASTIC application if appraised as per the actual distribution of nitrate data. The method based on supervised classification algorithms was able to produce a mapping in which about 45% of the points with high nitrate concentrations were located in areas predicted as high vulnerability, compared to 6% shown by the original DRASTIC method. The main difference between using one method or the other thus lies in the availability of sufficient nitrate data to train the models. It is concluded that artificial intelligence can lead to more robust results if enough data are available.
Funder
Spain’s Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities
STARS4Water
Reference49 articles.
1. Heise, H. (1994). Guidebook on mapping groundwater vulnerability. International Association of Hydrogeologists, The International Association of Hydrogeologists.
2. Recent trends in groundwater vulnerability assessment techniques: A review;Katyal;Int. J. Appl. Res.,2017
3. A comprehensive review of groundwater vulnerability assessment using index-based, modelling, and coupling methods;Goyal;J. Environ. Manag.,2021
4. Factor weighting in DRASTIC modeling;Pacheco;Sci. Total Environ.,2015
5. DRASTIC, GOD, and SI approaches for assessing groundwater vulnerability to pollution: A review;Fannakh;Environ. Sci. Eur.,2022