Benchmarking Three Event-Based Rainfall-Runoff Routing Models on Australian Catchments

Abstract

In the field of hydrology, event-based models are commonly used for flood-flow prediction in catchments, for use in flood forecasting, flood risk assessment, and infrastructure design. The models are simplistic, as they do not consider longer-term catchment processes such as evaporation and transpiration. This paper examines the relative performance of two widely used models, the American HEC-HMS model, the Australian RORB model, and a newer model, the RRR model. The evaluation is conducted on four case study catchments in Australia. The first two models, HEC-HMS and RORB, do not include baseflow, necessitating the estimation of baseflow through alternate means. By contrast, the RRR model includes baseflow, by extracting a separate loss from the rainfall, and then routing the resultant flow through the catchment, much like quickflow, but with a longer delay time. The models are calibrated and then verified with weighted mean parameter values on an independent set of events in each case study catchment. This gives an indication of the ability of the models to correctly predict flow, which is important when the models are used with design rainfalls to predict design flows. The results demonstrate that all models perform adequately on the four examined catchments, but the RRR model exhibits superior calibration, and, to a lesser extent, better validation compared to the other two models.