Metrological Protocols for Reaching Reliable and SI-Traceable Size Results for Multi-Modal and Complexly Shaped Reference Nanoparticles

Author:

Feltin Nicolas1,Crouzier Loïc1ORCID,Delvallée Alexandra1ORCID,Pellegrino Francesco2ORCID,Maurino Valter2ORCID,Bartczak Dorota3ORCID,Goenaga-Infante Heidi3,Taché Olivier4,Marguet Sylvie4ORCID,Testard Fabienne4,Artous Sébastien5ORCID,Saint-Antonin François5ORCID,Salzmann Christoph6,Deumer Jérôme7,Gollwitzer Christian7ORCID,Koops Richard8,Sebaïhi Noham9,Fontanges Richard10,Neuwirth Matthias11,Bergmann Detlef11,Hüser Dorothee11,Klein Tobias11ORCID,Hodoroaba Vasile-Dan6ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d’Essais (LNE), 29 Avenue Roger Hennequin, 78197 Trappes, France

2. Dipartimento di Chimica and NIS Inter-Department Centre, University of Torino, Via P. Giuria, 10125 Torino, Italy

3. National Measurement Laboratory, LGC Limited, Queens Road, Teddington TW11 0LY, UK

4. CEA, CNRS, NIMBE, Université Paris-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France

5. CEA, Liten, DTNM, Université Grenoble Alpes, 38000 Grenoble, France

6. Federal Institute for Materials Research and Testing (BAM), Unter den Eichen 44-46, 12203 Berlin, Germany

7. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Abbestraße 2–12, 10587 Berlin, Germany

8. VSL National Metrology Institute, Thjsseweg 11, 2629 JA Delft, The Netherlands

9. National Standards (SMD), FPS Economy, 16 Bd du Roi Albert II, B-1000 Brussels, Belgium

10. Pollen Metrology, 122 Rue du Rocher de Lorzier, Novespace A, 38430 Moirans, France

11. Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), Bundesallee 100, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

The study described in this paper was conducted in the framework of the European nPSize project (EMPIR program) with the main objective of proposing new reference certified nanomaterials for the market in order to improve the reliability and traceability of nanoparticle size measurements. For this purpose, bimodal populations as well as complexly shaped nanoparticles (bipyramids, cubes, and rods) were synthesized. An inter-laboratory comparison was organized for comparing the size measurements of the selected nanoparticle samples performed with electron microscopy (TEM, SEM, and TSEM), scanning probe microscopy (AFM), or small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS). The results demonstrate good consistency of the measured size by the different techniques in cases where special care was taken for sample preparation, instrument calibration, and the clear definition of the measurand. For each characterization method, the calibration process is described and a semi-quantitative table grouping the main error sources is proposed for estimating the uncertainties associated with the measurements. Regarding microscopy-based techniques applied to complexly shaped nanoparticles, data dispersion can be observed when the size measurements are affected by the orientation of the nanoparticles on the substrate. For the most complex materials, hybrid approaches combining several complementary techniques were tested, with the outcome being that the reliability of the size results was improved.

Funder

EMPIR

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Materials Science,General Chemical Engineering

Reference34 articles.

1. Small-angle X-ray scattering: Characterization of cubic Au nanoparticles using Debye’s scattering formula;Deumer;J. Appl. Cryst.,2022

2. (2021). 2021 Nanotechnologies—Measurements of Particle Size and Shape Distributions by Scanning Electron Microscopy (Standard No. Standard ISO 19749).

3. (2020). 2020 Nanotechnologies—Measurements of Particle Size and Shape Distributions by Transmission Electron Microscopy (Standard No. Standard ISO ISO 21363).

4. Challenges in the size analysis of a silica nanoparticle mixture as candidate certified reference material;Kestens;J. Nanopart. Res.,2016

5. Particle size distributions by transmission electron microscopy: An interlaboratory comparison case study;Rice;Metrologia,2013

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3