Design and Real-Time Implementation of a Cascaded Model Predictive Control Architecture for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles
-
Published:2024-02-29
Issue:5
Volume:12
Page:739
-
ISSN:2227-7390
-
Container-title:Mathematics
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Mathematics
Author:
Borbolla-Burillo Patricio1ORCID, Sotelo David1ORCID, Frye Michael2, Garza-Castañón Luis E.1ORCID, Juárez-Moreno Luis1ORCID, Sotelo Carlos1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Tecnologico de Monterrey, School of Engineering and Sciences, Ave. Eugenio Garza Sada 2501, Monterrey 64849, Mexico 2. Department of Engineering, University of the Incarnate Word, San Antonio, TX 78209, USA
Abstract
Modeling and control are challenging in unmanned aerial vehicles, especially in quadrotors where there exists high coupling between the position and the orientation dynamics. In simulations, conventional control strategies such as the use of a proportional–integral–derivative (PID) controller under different configurations are typically employed due to their simplicity and ease of design. However, linear assumptions have to be made, which turns into poor performance for practical applications on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). This paper designs and implements a hierarchical cascaded model predictive control (MPC) for three-dimensional trajectory tracking using a quadrotor platform. The overall system consists of two stages: the mission server and the commander stabilizer. Different from existing works, the heavy computational burden is managed by decomposing the overall MPC strategy into two different schemes. The first scheme controls the translational displacements while the second scheme regulates the rotational movements of the quadrotor. For validation, the performance of the proposed controller is compared against that of a proportional–integral–velocity (PIV) controller taken from the literature. Here, real-world experiments for tracking helicoidal and lemniscate trajectories are implemented, while for regulation, an extreme wind disturbance is applied. The experimental results show that the proposed controller outperforms the PIV controller, presenting less signal effort fluctuations, especially in terms of rejecting external wind disturbances.
Funder
The U. S. Army Research Laboratory and the U. S. Army Research Office
Reference52 articles.
1. A review of quadrotor unmanned aerial vehicles: Applications, architectural design and control algorithms;Idrissi;J. Intell. Robot. Syst.,2022 2. Low-cost quadrotor hardware design with PID control system as flight controller;Yusuf;TELKOMNIKA (Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Control.),2019 3. Shakeel, T., Arshad, J., Jaffery, M.H., Rehman, A.U., Eldin, E.T., Ghamry, N.A., and Shafiq, M. (2022). A Comparative Study of Control Methods for X3D Quadrotor Feedback Trajectory Control. Appl. Sci., 12. 4. Rinaldi, M., Primatesta, S., and Guglieri, G. (2023). A comparative study for control of quadrotor uavs. Appl. Sci., 13. 5. Chovancová, A., Fico, T., Duchoň, F., Dekan, M., Chovanec, L., and Dekanova, M. (2020). Control methods comparison for the real quadrotor on an innovative test stand. Appl. Sci., 10.
|
|