An Approach Based on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets for Considering Stakeholders’ Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction, and Hesitation in Software Features Prioritization

Author:

Gerogiannis Vassilis C.1ORCID,Tzimos Dimitrios1ORCID,Kakarontzas George1ORCID,Tsoni Eftychia2,Iatrellis Omiros1ORCID,Son Le Hoang3,Kanavos Andreas4ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Digital Systems, University of Thessaly, 41500 Larissa, Greece

2. Department of Informatics, Open Hellenic University, 26335 Patras, Greece

3. VNU Information Technology Institute, Vietnam National University, Hanoi 03000, Vietnam

4. Department of Informatics, Ionian University, 49100 Corfu, Greece

Abstract

This paper introduces a semi-automated approach for the prioritization of software features in medium- to large-sized software projects, considering stakeholders’ satisfaction and dissatisfaction as key criteria for the incorporation of candidate features. Our research acknowledges an inherent asymmetry in stakeholders’ evaluations, between the satisfaction from offering certain features and the dissatisfaction from not offering the same features. Even with systematic, ordinal scale-based prioritization techniques, involved stakeholders may exhibit hesitation and uncertainty in their assessments. Our approach aims to address these challenges by employing the Binary Search Tree prioritization method and leveraging the mathematical framework of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets to quantify the uncertainty of stakeholders when expressing assessments on the value of software features. Stakeholders’ rankings, considering satisfaction and dissatisfaction as features prioritization criteria, are mapped into Intuitionistic Fuzzy Numbers, and objective weights are automatically computed. Rankings associated with less hesitation are considered more valuable to determine the final features’ priorities than those rankings with more hesitation, reflecting lower indeterminacy or lack of knowledge from stakeholders. We validate our proposed approach with a case study, illustrating its application, and conduct a comparative analysis with existing software requirements prioritization methods.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference62 articles.

1. Wiegers, K., and Beatty, J. (2013). Software Requirements, Microsoft Press. [3rd ed.].

2. Chen, K., Zhang, W., Zhao, H., and Mei, H. (September, January 29). An approach to constructing feature models based on requirements clustering. Proceedings of the 3th IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (RE’05), Paris, France.

3. A systematic literature review of software requirements prioritization research;Achimugu;Inf. Softw. Technol.,2014

4. Software requirements prioritisation: A systematic literature review on significance, stakeholders, techniques and challenges;Hujainah;IEEE Access,2018

5. Svensson, R.B., Gorschek, T., Regnell, B., Torkar, R., Shahrokni, A., Feldt, R., and Aurum, A. (September, January 29). Prioritization of quality requirements: State of practice in eleven companies. Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conference, Washington, DC, USA.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3