Affiliation:
1. Key Laboratory of Aircraft Environment Control and Life Support, MIIT, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 29 Yudao Street, Nanjing 210016, China
2. Civil Aircraft Flight Test Center, Commercial Aircraft Corporation of China, Ltd., Shanghai 200232, China
3. School of Aircraft Engineering, Nanchang Hangkong University, Nanchang 330063, China
Abstract
Dynamic compressors are widely used in many industrial sectors, such as air, land, and marine vehicle engines, aircraft environmental control systems (ECS), air-conditioning and refrigeration, gas turbines, gas compression and injection, etc. The data-driven formulas of mass flow rate and isentropic efficiency of dynamic compressors are required for the design, energy analysis, performance simulation, and control- and/or diagnosis-oriented dynamic simulation of such compressors and the related systems. This work develops data-driven models for predicting the performance of dynamic compressors, including empirical models for mass flow rate and isentropic efficiency, which have high prediction accuracy and broad application range. The performance maps of two multi-stage axial compressors of an aero engine and a centrifugal compressor of an aircraft ECS were chosen for evaluation of the existing empirical formulas and testing of the new models. There are 16 empirical models of mass flow rate and 14 empirical models of isentropic efficiency evaluated, and the results show that it is necessary to develop highly accurate empirical formulas both for mass flow rate and isentropic efficiency. With the data-driven method, two empirical models for mass flow rate and one for isentropic efficiency are developed. They are in general form, with some terms removable to make them simple while enhancing their applicability and prediction accuracy. The new models have much higher prediction accuracy than the best existing counterparts. The new mass flow rate models predict for the three compressors a mean absolute relative deviation (MAD) not greater than 1.3%, while the best existing models all have MAD > 2.0%. The new efficiency model predicts for the three compressors an MAD of 1.0%, 0.4%, and 1.9%, respectively, while the best existing model predicts for the three compressors an MAD of 1.8%, 0.8%, and 3.2%, respectively.