Artificial Intelligence Approach in Aerospace for Error Mitigation
-
Published:2024-04-11
Issue:4
Volume:11
Page:300
-
ISSN:2226-4310
-
Container-title:Aerospace
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Aerospace
Author:
Bautista-Hernández Jorge12ORCID, Martín-Prats María Ángeles1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Electronics Engineering, University of Seville, 41004 Seville, Spain 2. Department of Electrical Engineering, Airbus Poland, 02-256 Warsaw, Poland
Abstract
Many of the reports created at assembly lines, where all components of an aircraft are installed, frequently indicate that errors threaten safety. The proposed methodology in this study evaluates error prediction and risk mitigation to prevent failures and their consequences. The results linked to a typical electrical harness manufacture of a military aircraft estimated reductions of 93% in time and 90% in error during the creation of engineering manufacturing processes using AI techniques. However, traditional risk assessments methods struggle to identify and mitigate errors effectively. Thus, developing an advanced methodology to ensure systems safety is needed. This paper addresses how innovative AI technology solutions can overcome these challenges, mitigate error risks, and enhance safety in aerospace. Technologies, such as artificial intelligence, predictive algorithms, machine learning, and automation, can play a key role in enhancing safety. The aim of this study is to develop a model that considers the factors that can potentially contribute to error creation, through an artificial intelligence (AI) approach. The specific AI techniques used such as support vector machine, random forest, logistic regression, K-nearest neighbor, and XGBoost (Python 3.8.5) show good performance for use in error mitigation. We have compared the modeled values obtained in this study with the experimental ones. The results confirm that the best metrics are obtained by using support vector machine and logistic regression. The smallest deviation between the measured and modeled values for these AI methods do not exceed 5%. Furthermore, using advancements in machine learning methods can enhance error mitigation in aerospace. The use of AutoML can play a key role in automatically finding an appropriate model which provides the best performance metrics and therefore the most reliable forecast for data prediction and error mitigation.
Reference42 articles.
1. ICAO (2013). Safety Management Manual, Doc 9859, International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO). 2. Barr, L.C., Newman, R., Ancel, E., Belcastro, C.M., Foster, J.V., Evans, J., and Klyde, D.H. (2017, January 5–9). Preliminary risk assessment for small unmanned aircraft systems. Proceedings of the 17th AIAA Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Denver, CO, USA. 3. A new accident model for engineering safer systems;Leveson;Saf. Sci.,2004 4. O’Hare, D. (2003). Aeronautical Decision Making: Metaphors, Models, and Methods, Routledge. 5. Stamatelatos, M., Dezfuli, H., Apostolakis, G., Everline, C., Guarro, S., Mathias, D., Mosleh, A., Paulos, T., Riha, D., and Smith, C. (2011). Probabilistic Risk Assessment Procedures Guide for NASA Managers and Practitioners.
|
|