Risk Assessment Method for UAV’s Sense and Avoid System Based on Multi-Parameter Quantification and Monte Carlo Simulation

Author:

Fitrikananda Bona P.12,Jenie Yazdi Ibrahim1ORCID,Sasongko Rianto Adhy1,Muhammad Hari1

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Institut Teknologi Bandung, Jl. Ganesha 10, Bandung 40132, Indonesia

2. PT. Dirgantara Indonesia, Jalan Pajajaran No. 154, Bandung 40174, Indonesia

Abstract

The rise in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) usage has opened exciting possibilities but has also introduced risks, particularly in aviation, with instances of UAVs flying dangerously close to commercial airplanes. The potential for accidents underscores the urgent need for effective measures to mitigate mid-air collision risks. This research aims to assess the effectiveness of the Sense and Avoid (SAA) system during operation by providing a rating system to quantify its parameters and operational risk, ultimately enabling authorities, developers, and operators to make informed decisions to reach a certain level of safety. Seven parameters are quantified in this research: the SAA’s detection range, field of view, sensor accuracy, measurement rate, system integration, and the intruder’s range and closing speed. While prior studies have addressed these parameter quantifications separately, this research’s main contribution is the comprehensive method that integrates them all within a simple five-level risk rating system. This quantification is complemented by a risk assessment simulator capable of testing a UAV’s risk rating within a large sample of arbitrary flight traffic in a Monte Carlo simulation setup, which ultimately derives its maximum risk rating. The simulation results demonstrated safety improvements using the SAA system, shown by the combined maximum risk rating value. Among the contributing factors, the detection range and sensor accuracy of the SAA system stand out as the primary drivers of this improvement. This conclusion is consistent even in more regulated air traffic imposed with five or three mandatory routes. Interestingly, increasing the number of intruders to 50 does not alter the results, as the intruders’ probability of being detected remains almost the same. On the other hand, improving SAA radar capability has a more significant effect on risk rating than enforcing regulations or limiting intruders.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Aerospace Engineering

Reference28 articles.

1. DeGarmo, M.T. (2004). Issues Concerning Integration of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles in Civil Airspace, MITRE Center for Advanced Aviation System Development.

2. MAA, and BALPA (2016). Small Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (Drones) Mid-Air Collision Study, Department for Transport, Crown.

3. On unmanned aircraft systems issues, challenges and operational restrictions preventing integration into the National Airspace System;Dalamagkidis;Prog. Aero. Sci.,2008

4. Bijjahalli, S., Gardi, A., Pongsakornsathien, N., Sabatini, R., and Kistan, T.A. (2022). Unified Airspace Risk Management Framework for UAS Operations. Drones, 6.

5. Valavanis, K., and Vachtsevanos, G. (2015). Handbook of Unmanned Aerial Vehicles, Springer.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3