Affiliation:
1. Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Process Enhancement and New Energy Equipment Technology, School of Mechanical and Power Engineering, Nanjing Tech University, Nanjing 211816, China
2. College of Aerospace Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 210016, China
3. Nanjing Engineering Institute of Aircraft Systems, Aviation Industry Corporation of China, Nanjing 211106, China
Abstract
Fuel vapor concentration is a key parameter for assessing the flammability of aircraft fuel tanks. However, the current research on RP-3 (Rocket Propellant-3) fuel vapor concentration is inadequate. This study categorizes fuel components by the number of carbon atoms and utilizes Raoult’s law to estimate the gas–liquid equilibrium relationship of each constituent element under equilibrium conditions. The equilibrium-state model is experimentally validated, and the differences in the constituents and fuel vapor concentrations of RP-3 and Jet-A (Jet Fuel-A) fuels are analyzed. In addition, an empirical correlation between the overall hydrocarbon concentration of RP-3 fuel vapor and the temperature and pressure in the equilibrium state is established, providing a theoretical basis for determining RP-3 fuel vapor concentration in related investigations. Furthermore, a transient prediction model of fuel vapor concentration is developed using the lumped parameter approach that considers the heat exchange among the fuel, gas, wall, and environment. The model’s accuracy is confirmed by comparing it to existing literature. Then, the temperature and fuel vapor concentration variation patterns in the fuel tank are calculated and evaluated under two typical flight scenarios. The results show a significant difference between the calculated fuel vapor concentration values obtained through equilibrium-state and transient models. Therefore, in the design of fuel vapor catalytic inerting systems, it is crucial to consider both the equilibrium and transient fuel vapor concentration values rather than relying solely on the former. Throughout the flight envelope, gas phase and fuel phase temperatures in RP-3, Jet-A, and C10H22 fuel tanks exhibit minimal differences. However, significant variations in fuel vapor concentration exist depending on the flight state and envelope. Hence, regarding RP-3 as equivalent to C10H22 is inappropriate. Additionally, fuel vapor concentration is a more suitable metric than fuel temperature for assessing fuel tank flammability.
Funder
National Natural Science Foundation of China Civil Aviation Joint Fund
Reference28 articles.
1. Smith, D.E. (2014). Fuel Tank Inerting Systems for Civil Aircraft. [Ph.D. Thesis, College of Engineering, Colorado State University].
2. Performance of an oxygen-consuming inerting system for an aircraft fuel tank with RP-3 aviation fuel in flight;Peng;Aerosp. Sci. Technol.,2022
3. Marciello, V., Di Stasio, M., Ruocco, M., Trifari, V., Nicolosi, F., Meindl, M., Lemoine, B., and Caliandro, P. (2023). Design exploration for sustainable regional Hybrid-Electric aircraft: A study based on technology forecasts. Aerospace, 10.
4. Fuel Flammability Task Group (1998). A Review of the Flammability Hazard of Jet a Fuel Vapor in Civil Transport Aircraft Fuel Tanks, 20591 Report No. DOT/FAA/AR-98/26.
5. Effect of air supplementation on the performance of an onboard catalytic inerting system;Feng;Aerosp. Sci. Technol.,2019
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献