Mechanism and Performance Differences between the SSG/LRR-ω and SST Turbulence Models in Separated Flows

Abstract

Accurate predictions of flow separation are important for aerospace design, flight accident avoidance, and the development of fluid mechanics. However, the complexity of the separation process makes accurate predictions challenging for all known Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes (RANS) methods, and the underlying mechanism of action remains unclear. This paper analyzes the specific reasons for the defective predictions of the turbulence models applied to separated flows, explores the physical properties that impact the predictions, and investigates their specific mechanisms. Taking the Menter SST and the Speziale-Sarkar–Gatski/Launder–Reece–Rodi (SSG/LRR)-ω models as representatives, three typical separated flow cases are calculated. The performance differences between the two turbulence models applied to the different separated flow calculations are then compared. Refine the vital physical properties and analyze their calculation from the basic assumptions, modeling ideas, and construction of the turbulence models. The numerical results show that the underestimation of Reynolds stress is a significant factor in the unsatisfactory prediction of separation. In the SST model, Bradshaw’s assumption imposes the turbulent energy equilibrium condition in all regions and the eddy–viscosity coefficient is underestimated, which leads to advanced separation and lagging reattachment. In the SSG/LRR-ω model, the fidelity with which the pressure–strain term is modeled is a profound factor affecting the calculation accuracy.