A Coaxial Pulsed Plasma Thruster Model with Efficient Flyback Converter Approaches for Small Satellites
-
Published:2023-06-05
Issue:6
Volume:10
Page:540
-
ISSN:2226-4310
-
Container-title:Aerospace
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Aerospace
Author:
O’Reilly Dillon1ORCID, Herdrich Georg2ORCID, Schäfer Felix2ORCID, Montag Christoph2, Worden Simon P.3ORCID, Meaney Peter4, Kavanagh Darren F.1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, South East Technological University, Carlow Campus, Kilkenny Rd, R93 V960 Carlow, Ireland 2. Institut für Raumfahrtsysteme/Institute of Space Systems (IRS), University of Stuttgart, Pfaffenwaldring 31, 70569 Stuttgart, Germany 3. Breakthrough Prize Foundation, NASA Research Park, Building 18, P.O. Box 1, Moffett Field, CA 94035, USA 4. Microchip Technology Inc., Cork, Co., D03 Y564 Cork, Ireland
Abstract
Pulsed plasma thrusters (PPT) have demonstrated enormous potential since the 1960s. One major shortcoming is their low thrust efficiency, typically <30%. Most of these losses are due to joule heating, while some can be attributed to poor efficiency of the power processing units (PPUs). We model PPTs to improve their efficiency, by exploring the use of power electronic topologies to enhance the power conversion efficiency from the DC source to the thruster head. Different control approaches are considered, starting off with the basic approach of a fixed frequency flyback converter. Then, the more advanced critical conduction mode (CrCM) flyback, as well as other optimized solutions using commercial off-the-shelf (COTS) components, are presented. Variations of these flyback converters are studied under different control regimes, such as zero voltage switching (ZVS), valley voltage switching (VVS), and hard switched, to enhance the performance and efficiency of the PPU. We compare the max voltage, charge time, and the overall power conversion efficiency for different operating regimes. Our analytical results show that a more dynamic control regime can result in fewer losses and enhanced performance, offering an improved power conversion efficiency for PPUs used with PPTs. An efficiency of 86% was achieved using the variable frequency approach. This work has narrowed the possible PPU options through analytical analysis and has therefore identified a strategic approach for future investigations. In addition, a new low-power coaxial micro-thruster model using equivalent circuit model elements is developed.This is referred to as the Carlow–Stuttgart model and has been validated against experimental data from vacuum chamber tests in Stuttgart’s Pulsed Plasma Laboratory. This work serves as a valuable precursor towards the implementation of highly optimized PPU designs for efficient PPT thrusters for the next PETRUS (pulsed electrothermal thruster for the University of Stuttgart) missions.
Funder
Irish Research Council
Subject
Aerospace Engineering
Reference56 articles.
1. O’Reilly, D., Herdrich, G., and Kavanagh, D.F. (2022). Electric Propulsion Methods for Small Satellites: A Review. Aerospace, 8. 2. Space Propulsion Technology for Small Spacecraft;Krejci;IEEE Xplore,2018 3. The technological and commercial expansion of electric propulsion;Lev;Acta Astronaut.,2019 4. Kazeev, M.N., Kozubskiy, K.N., and Popov, G.A. (2009, January 20–24). Pioneer of the First Space Electric Propulsion System Development and Space Tests. Proceedings of the International Electric Propulsion Conference, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. 5. Arrington, A.L., Haag, W.T., and Meckel, J.N. (1997, January 24–28). A Performance Comparison of Pulsed Plasma Thruster Electrode Configurations. Proceedings of the International Electric Propulsion Conference, Cleveland, OH, USA.
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|