Affiliation:
1. Ocean College, Zhejiang University, Zhoushan 316021, China
2. AECC Hunan Aviation Powerplant Research Institute, Zhuzhou 412002, China
3. College of Energy Engineering, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310027, China
4. Zhejiang Hiro Aeronautics Technology Co., Ltd., Deqing 313219, China
Abstract
This paper addresses the critical issue of turbine blade containment in aircraft engines, crucial for ensuring flight safety. Through a comprehensive approach integrating numerical simulations and experimental validations, the containment capabilities of gas turbine engine casings are thoroughly analyzed. The study investigates the impact dynamics, deformation characteristics, and energy absorption mechanisms during blade detachment events, shedding light on the containment process. Based on the multi-stage nature of gas turbines, two different blade structures were designed for turbine blades. Utilizing finite element simulation and the Johnson–Cook constitutive equation, this study accurately simulated single-blade and dual-blade containment scenarios. The simulation results of the single blade indicate that the process of a gas turbine blade impacting the casing primarily consists of three stages. The second stage, where the tenon root strikes the casing, is identified as the main cause of casing damage. Meanwhile, in the dual-blade simulation, the second blade, influenced by the first blade, directly impacts the casing after fracturing, resulting in greater damage. Then, eight corresponding containment tests were conducted based on the simulation results, validating the accuracy of the simulation parameters. Experimental verification of simulation results further confirms the validity of the proposed containment curves, providing essential insights for optimizing casing design and enhancing the safety and reliability of aircraft engines.
Funder
National Science and Technology Major Projects of China
Reference31 articles.
1. Meher-Homji, C.B. (1995, January 5–8). Blading Vibration and Failures in Gas Turbines: Part B—Compressor and Turbine Airfoil Distress. Proceedings of the ASME International Gas Turbine and Aeroengine Congress and Exposition, Houston, TX, USA.
2. Australian Transport Safety Bureau, and Canberra ACT (2002). Examination of a Failed Rolls-Royce RB211-524 Turbofan Engine—Boeing Commercial Aircraft Group, 747-436, G-BNLD.
3. Federal Aviation Administratio (1997). Design Considerations for Minimizing Hazards Caused by Uncontained Turbine Engine and Auxiliary Power Unit Rotor Failure.
4. Effects of multiple blade interaction on the containment of blade fragments during a rotor failure;Sarkar;J. Finite Elem. Anal. Des.,1996
5. Federal Aviation Administration (1984). Federal Aviation Administration Regulations, Part 33, Airworthiness Standards: Aircraft Engines.