Rethinking Conceptual Parameters of Choreography (in Social Spaces)—Actualization of Intensities in Discursive Fields

Author:

Monni Kirsi1

Affiliation:

1. Theatre Academy, University of the Arts Helsinki, FI-00097 Helsinki, Finland

Abstract

This article aims to take part in the ongoing discussion on the social and political potentialities as well as the conceptual premises of choreography and to contribute to the discussion about world relations in the choreographed movement. The much-used definition of Western choreography is “organized movement in space and time”. Although this definition always applies, it does not specify the world relations and worldmaking capacities of the choreographed movement. The main focus of this article is an ontological rethinking of the basic concepts of choreography: movement, space, time and organization, with the addition of kinaesthetic fields, kinaesthetic and spatial intelligence, virtual and actual realms, striated and smooth spaces (Deleuze and Guattari) and different conceptions of time. By analyzing these concepts, the aim is to provide a view of ontologically elementary units in choreography (such as a change in space, the difference over time and space, and passage to shared actuality), with a wider understanding of the inherent social relationality in choreographed movement. After discussing these topics, a few social choreography events and protests are described to represent different choreographic aims and organizational modes arising from each specific situation. The article concludes by proposing that choreography could be seen as organizing movement in space and time but also as a choreographic actualization of intensities in different discursive fields.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference37 articles.

1. Waterfield, Robin (2008). Physics, Oxford University Press. Introduction by David Bostock.

2. Barad, Karen (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway. Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. United States of America, Duke University Press.

3. Bateson, Gregory (1970/1987). Steps to an Ecologyof Mind. Collected Essays in Anthropology, Psyhciatry, Evolution, and Epistemology, Jason Aronson Inc.

4. Bennet, Jane (2010). Vibrant Matter. A Political Ecology of Things, Duke University Press.

5. Cohen, S. Marc (2023, July 25). Aristotle’s Definition of Kinēsis: Physics III.1. Available online: https://faculty.washington.edu/smcohen/433/KinesisLecture.pdf.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3