Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher, Asheville, NC 28806, USA
Abstract
The enigmatic 72 Verses for St. Martial is one of the many works by Ademar de Chabannes (989–1034) crafted to promote the false narrative that St. Martial of Limoges, rather than being a third-century bishop, was actually a first-century apostle. The composition is visually striking due to the acrostic formed from the first letter of each tercet, MARCIALIS APOSTOLVS XRISTI, and its two overlapping melodies, one in black ink and the other in red. The relationship between the two notations is the subject of debate: Paul Hooreman’s conclusion that they are two variations of the same monophonic chant is countered by Manuel Pedro Ferreira, who argues that Hooreman’s reasoning is insufficient to rule out polyphony. I use Ferreira’s assessment as a jumping-off point for the current analysis, which investigates the compositional processes underlying the creation of the 72 Verses. Hooreman describes many details in the chant as subject to disorganization, scribal error, lack of ability, etc., but when the chant is analyzed polyphonically, these problems resolve. Beyond the music itself, the chant’s unusual polyphonic structure features reveals that the chant is structured around medieval maps, moving between a mappa mundi and the celestial spheres.
Reference8 articles.
1. Busse-Berger, Anna Maria (2005). Medieval Music and the Art of Memory, University of California Press.
2. Carruthers, Mary (1998). The Craft of Thought: Meditation, Rhetoric, and the Making of Images, 400–1200, Cambridge University Press.
3. Ferreira, Manuel Pedro (Revista Portuguesa de Musicologia No. 12, Lisboa, 2002). Is it Polyphony?, Revista Portuguesa de Musicologia No. 12, Lisboa.
4. Grier, James (2006). The Musical World of a Medieval Monk: Adémar de Chabannes in Eleventh-century Aquitaine, Cambridge University Press.
5. Higgins, Dick (1987). Pattern Poetry: Guide to an Unknown Literature, State University of New York Press.