Hemodynamic Consequence of Interventional Cardiac Catheterization in the Early Postoperative Period after Congenital Heart Surgery

Author:

Eason Daniel E.1,Rossi Anthony F.2,Aldawsari Khalifah A.3,Patel Bhavi2,Farooq Habiba4,Khan Danyal M.2

Affiliation:

1. Pediatric Cardiology, Golisano Children’s Hospital of Southwest Florida, Fort Myers, FL 33908, USA

2. The Heart Institute, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, FL 33155, USA

3. Pediatric Department, Nicklaus Children’s Hospital, Miami, FL 33155, USA

4. Independent Research, Miami, FL 33908, USA

Abstract

While still considered a high-risk procedure, cardiac catheterization during the early postoperative period is being performed more frequently in the current era. Limited data are currently available concerning the acute hemodynamic consequences of these procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety/efficacy of cardiac catheterization performed within thirty days of congenital heart surgery. We completed a retrospective review of all catheterizations within 30 days of congenital heart surgery. Procedures were performed due to failure to progress or hemodynamic deterioration. There were 1873 congenital heart surgeries during the study period. One hundred and three (6.2%) patients with a median age of 124 days underwent catheterization. Sixty-three cases received interventions, and forty patients underwent diagnostic catheterization. Early cardiac catheterization did not show a significant immediate change in the hemodynamics or inotrope score. Survival for patients undergoing diagnostic Cath (81%) did not differ significantly from the intervention group (89%). Although cardiac catheterization was performed on patients at the highest risk for death in the postoperative period, catheter intervention did not increase the risk of death. Those patients undergoing catheter intervention did not seem to experience major adverse events but achieved mild improvement in tissue perfusion.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference17 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3