Determining the Innovativeness of Nurses Who Engage in Activities That Encourage Innovative Behaviors

Author:

Leary Marion1,Demiris George12,Brooks Carthon J. Margo12,Cacchione Pamela Z.123,Aryal Subhash4,Bauermeister Jose A.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

2. Leonard Davis Institute of Healthcare Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

3. Penn Presbyterian Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA

4. School of Nursing, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA

Abstract

Background: We sought to understand the innovativeness of nurses engaging in innovative behaviors and quantify the associated characteristics that make nurses more able to innovate in practice. We first compared the innovativeness scores of our population; then we examined those who self-identified as an innovator versus those who did not to explore differences associated with innovativeness between these groups. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study of nurses in the US engaging in innovative behaviors was performed. We performed an exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to determine the correlates of innovative behavior. Results: Three-hundred and twenty-nine respondents completed the survey. Respondents who viewed themselves as innovators had greater exposure to HCD/DT workshops in the past year (55.8% vs. 36.6%, p = 0.02). The mean innovativeness score of our sample was 120.3 ± 11.2 out of a score of 140. The mean innovativeness score was higher for those who self-identified as an innovator compared with those who did not (121.3 ± 10.2 vs. 112.9 ± 14.8, p =< 0.001). The EFA created four factor groups: Factor 1 (risk aversion), Factor 2 (willingness to try new things), Factor 3 (creativity and originality) and Factor 4 (being challenged). Conclusion: Nurses who view themselves as innovators have higher innovativeness scores compared with those who do not. Multiple individual and organizational characteristics are associated with the innovativeness of nurses.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference26 articles.

1. Peer reviewed: Design thinking in health care;Altman;Prev. Chronic Dis.,2018

2. An Integrative Review of Human-centered Design and Design Thinking for the Creation of Health Interventions;Leary;Nurs. Forum,2022

3. American Nurses Association (2022, July 01). ANA Enterprise Strategic Plan. Available online: https://www.nursingworld.org/~4abeff/globalassets/ana-enterprise/about-us/descriptions-enterprise-strategies-and-objectives.pdf.

4. BDO (2021, February 13). Unleashing Nurse-Led Innovation. Available online: https://www.bdo.com/insights/industries/healthcare/unleashing-nurse-led-innovation.

5. (2023, April 29). The Future of Nursing 2020–2030: Charting a Path to Achieve Health Equity. Available online: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/25982/the-future-of-nursing-2020-2030-charting-a-path-to.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3