Mentoring Support Quality in Group and Individual Mentoring Approaches during Nursing Clinical Training: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Author:

Gusar Ivana1ORCID,Tokić Andrea2ORCID,Lovrić Robert3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Studies, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia

2. Department of Psychology, University of Zadar, 23000 Zadar, Croatia

3. Nursing Institute “Prof. Radivoje Radić”, Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health Osijek, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia

Abstract

Clinical training is an essential element in nursing education, the outcomes of which are directly related to the quality of mentoring support. This quasi-experimental study aimed to examine whether the group or individual form of the mentoring approach used and the order of application of the mentoring approach contribute to the quality of mentoring support provided to students. The study comprised two measurement points with 130 nursing students, divided into two groups with different orders of application of the mentoring approach. The validated Mentoring Support Quality Evaluation Questionnaire (MSEQ) was used. Students in both groups rated the quality of mentoring support as higher following an individual mentoring approach. A significant interaction was found between the mentoring approach used and the order in which the mentoring approaches were applied (p = 0.002). The individual mentoring approach contributed significantly to a higher quality of mentoring support after the second round of clinical training (p = 0.021), while after the first round, the difference between the group and individual approaches was not as clear. The results suggest that not only the form of the mentoring approach but also the sequence of changes in the mentoring approach should be planned when implementing clinical training.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference34 articles.

1. Mlaba, Z.P., and Emmamally, W. (2019). Describing the perceptions of student nurses regarding barriers and benefits of a peer-mentorship programme in a clinical setting in kwazulunatal. Health SA Gesondheid, 24.

2. Nursing student evaluations on the quality of mentoring support in individual, dual, and group approaches during clinical training: A prospective cohort study;Gusar;Aust. J. Adv. Nurs.,2020

3. European Parliament and the Council of the European Union (2013). Directive 2013/55/EU of the European parliament and of the council of 20 November 2013 amending Directive 2005/36/EC on the recognition of professional qualifications and Regulation (EU) No 1024/2012 on administrative cooperation through the Internal Mark. Off. J. Eur. Union, 55, 132–169.

4. Clinical Supervision in Undergraduate Nursing Students: A Review of the Literature;Franklin;E-J. Bus. Educ. Scholarsh. Teach.,2013

5. Satisfaction with nursing education, job satisfaction, and work intentions of new graduate nurses;Kenny;Nurse Educ. Today,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3