Interdisciplinary Analysis of Science Communication on Social Media during the COVID-19 Crisis

Author:

Mandl Thomas1ORCID,Jaki Sylvia2ORCID,Mitera Hannah1,Schmidt Franziska2

Affiliation:

1. Information Science, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany

2. Specialized Communication, University of Hildesheim, Universitätsplatz 1, 31141 Hildesheim, Germany

Abstract

In times of crisis, science communication needs to be accessible and convincing. In order to understand whether these two criteria apply to concrete science communication formats, it is not enough to merely study the communication product. Instead, the recipient’s perspective also needs to be taken into account. What do recipients value in popular science communication formats concerning COVID-19? What do they criticize? What elements in the formats do they pay attention to? These questions can be answered by reception studies, for example, by analyzing the reactions and comments of social media users. This is particularly relevant since scientific information was increasingly disseminated over social media channels during the COVID-19 crisis. This interdisciplinary study, therefore, focuses both on science communication strategies in media formats and the related comments on social media. First, we selected science communication channels on YouTube and performed a qualitative multi-modal analysis. Second, the comments responding to science communication content online were analyzed by identifying Twitter users who are doctors, researchers, science communicators and those who represent research institutes and then, subsequently, performing topic modeling on the textual data. The main goal was to find topics that directly related to science communication strategies. The qualitative video analysis revealed, for example, a range of strategies for accessible communication and maintaining transparency about scientific insecurities. The quantitative Twitter analysis showed that few tweets commented on aspects of the communication strategies. These were mainly positive while the sentiment in the overall collection was less positive. We downloaded and processed replies for 20 months, starting at the beginning of the pandemic, which resulted in a collection of approximately one million tweets from the German science communication market.

Funder

Volkswagen Foundation

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference56 articles.

1. Human information behavior during the COVID-19 health crisis. A literature review;Montesi;Libr. Inf. Sci. Res.,2021

2. Jaki, S., and Sabban, A. (2016). Wissensformate in den Medien: Analysen aus Medienlinguistik und Medienwissenschaft, Frank & Timme GmbH.

3. More than entertainment: YouTube and public responses to the science of global warming and climate change;Shapiro;Soc. Sci. Inf.,2015

4. This is simplified to the point of banality.: Social-Media-Kommentare zu Gestaltungsweisen von TV-Dokus;Jaki;J. FüR Medien.,2021

5. Leveraging data science to combat COVID-19: A comprehensive review;Latif;IEEE Trans. Artif. Intell.,2020

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3