An Evolving Risk Landscape: Insights from a Decade of Surveys of Executives and Risk Professionals

Author:

Beasley Mark,Branson Bruce,Pagach DonORCID

Abstract

We report on the results obtained from ten annual surveys of global business executives on their perceptions of the most significant risks facing their organizations in the ensuing calendar year. These surveys of C-suite executives, directors and other risk professionals elicit their concerns about risks that may affect their organization’s success over the near-term horizon (i.e., the next calendar year). After a decade, we believe these results provide an opportunity to examine how the global risk landscape has evolved. In addition, two additional survey questions allow us to examine how these executives view the overall risk context and how enterprise risk management (ERM) is deployed and augmented in the face of an escalating risk environment. On average, we find that executives view the risk landscape they face as persistently risky over the ten-year period, even during the relatively robust economic environments for much of that time frame. Two industries report much more volatility in their risk environments, with respondents from the Healthcare sector and in Technology, Media and Telecommunications acknowledging the largest volatility. We also observe an increase in entities’ decisions to devote more time and resources to risk management over the ten-year period, suggesting that ERM has become an essential mechanism for organizational success. Our goal is to highlight the realities of constantly changing risk conditions and how context (e.g., industry and time) is an important distinguishing factor that affects an organization’s given risk profile, which is relevant to both executives and academics. Collectively, our findings emphasize the importance of understanding the ever-changing context of an organization’s environment, that risk identification must be an ongoing process, and that there is no “one-size-fits-all” approach to risk governance. We believe all this signals the importance of future research to help organizations respond with robust risk governance.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Finance,Economics and Econometrics,Accounting,Business, Management and Accounting (miscellaneous)

Reference33 articles.

1. Risk management, corporate governance, and bank performance in the financial crisis;Aebi;Journal of Banking and Finance,2012

2. AON (2022, September 07). Global Risk Management Survey. Available online: http://www.aon.com/attachments/risk-services/2013-GRMS-Executive-Summary.pdf.

3. Association for Financial Professionals (2022, September 07). 2021 AFP RISK SURVEY: Post Crisis and Preparation for the Future. Available online: https://www.marshmclennan.com/insights/publications/2021/september/2021-afp-risk-survey.html.

4. Enterprise risk management program quality: Determinants, value relevance, and the financial crisis;Baxter;Contemporary Accounting Research,2013

5. Beasley, Mark S., and Branson, Bruce C. (2022, September 07). 2022 State of Risk Oversight, 13th ed. Available online: https://erm.ncsu.edu/library/article/2022-risk-oversight-report-erm-ncstate-lp.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3