Abstract
To date, independent ethical oversight of many companion animal welfare initiatives has been limited and, in some instances, inadequate. Beyond a blurred line between “innovation” and “research,” the nature of the work conducted in animal welfare projects is often poorly aligned with established institutional ethical review structures, which are designed for research involving humans or research involving animals and are also focused on industry and academic institutions. This commentary details the struggle of one United States-based nonprofit organization to find ethical guidelines and support for conducting non-traditional field-based animal welfare studies, and subsequent experience establishing an Ethical Review Board to evaluate organizational initiatives. The commentary discusses member selection, materials and processes, and lessons and learnings from the creation and use of an Ethical Review Board. Sharing content of the ethical review process, as well as challenges and learnings from it, is intended to support other organizations and individuals seeking to ensure that innovation for animal welfare consistently meets high ethical standards.
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference23 articles.
1. Innovation Grantshttps://www.maddiesfund.org/innovation.htm
2. DOGS RULE.™/Innovation Grantshttps://www.pedigreefoundation.org/grant-program/
3. Innovation Showdownhttps://www.petcofoundation.org/innovation-showdown/
4. Exploring the Gaps in Practical Ethical Guidance for Animal Welfare Considerations of Field Interventions and Innovations Targeting Dogs and Cats
5. Ethics in research beyond the human;Collard,2015