Affiliation:
1. Department of Accounting and Information Systems, Osnabrück University, 49074 Osnabrück, Germany
Abstract
Labor shortages lead to crucial investment decisions, such as selecting software supporting work processes. The healthcare sector stands out because of additional restructuring due to demographic changes. This is particularly true for the care sector; hence, customized case management software (CMSW) solutions for healthcare professionals are being developed. In an increasingly profit-oriented healthcare system, sustainability, cost-effectiveness and quantification of benefits of investments play a major role. We analyzed research dealing with the benefits of case and care management software and, additionally, interviewed case managers who use recently developed CMSW within a case study. We used utility effect chains to visualize and quantify the gathered benefits of an information system (IS) investment along with the healthcare system in Germany. The findings show that benefits from care management software need to be seen more holistically. Utility effect chains can serve as a helpful instrument for the visualization of indirect benefits in healthcare. The most significant benefits of CMSW were found to be various cost savings for each of the participating stakeholders, a reduction in redundant entries of patient data and the prevention of cost-intensive revolving door cases. Additionally, the insight into patient records reduces time-consuming communication among health experts and family caregivers.
Funder
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Osnabrück University
Subject
Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction
Reference34 articles.
1. Economic Evaluation of E-Health Interventions Compared with Alternative Treatments in Older Persons’ Care: A Systematic Review;Rezapour;J. Educ. Health Promot.,2021
2. Bergmo, T.S. (2015). How to Measure Costs and Benefits of Ehealth Interventions: An Overview of Methods and Frameworks. J. Med. Internet Res., 17.
3. Pohlmann, S., Kunz, A., Ose, D., Winkler, E.C., Brandner, A., Poss-Doering, R., Szecsenyi, J., and Wensing, M. (2020). Digitalizing Health Services by Implementing a Personal Electronic Health Record in Germany: Qualitative Analysis of Fun-damental Prerequisites From the Perspective of Selected Experts. J. Med. Internet Res., 22.
4. Healthcare IT Adoption: An Analysis of Knowledge Transfer in Socioeconomic Networks;Peng;J. Manag. Inf. Syst.,2014
5. Vassolo, R.S., Cawley, A.F.M., Tortorella, G.L., Fogliatto, F.S., Tlapa, D., and Narayanamurthy, G. (2021). Hospital Investment Decisions in Healthcare 4.0 Technologies: Scoping Review and Framework for Exploring Challenges, Trends, and Research Directions. J. Med. Internet Res., 23.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献