Affiliation:
1. Department of Chemical Engineering, Marmara University, İstanbul 34854, Türkiye
2. Maltepe Municipality, İstanbul 34843, Türkiye
Abstract
While it is of great importance to evaluate plastic waste within the framework of a circular economy today, it is also of great importance to evaluate flexible plastic packaging, which is increasingly used in order to prevent environmental problems. To avoid the disadvantages experienced in recycling due to its multilayer nature, in this study, a life cycle assessment was made for flexible packages consisting of PET/metallized PET/PE and PP/metallized PP/PP with the data provided by the R&D Center of Elif Plastik Ambalaj Sanayi ve Tic. A.Ş.-Huhtamaki Flexibles Istanbul. Within the scope of this evaluation, two types of flexible packaging were analyzed, and an optimal flexible packaging structure for Türkiye was revealed by comparing different scenarios based on different methods in SimaPro 8.1.1.16. LCA was performed for both packages with cumulative energy demand (CED) and CML-IA methods. Four scenarios with different amounts of recycled raw materials were compared against the existing system and a fifth scenario, where electricity is assumed to be obtained from solar energy. Overall, we found that the largest environmental impact was in the existing system. However, despite being a renewable energy source, we observed that the solar energy scenario had almost as significant an impact as the existing system. When scenarios involving recycled raw materials were examined, we clearly observed that as the amount of recycled raw materials increased, the environmental impact decreased. Therefore, it emerged that the scenario with the highest amount of recycled raw materials is the most optimal scenario in many respects. There are clear differences in the results due to differences in plastic types. This study, conducted with real data, is highly important for the flexible packaging literature. A table has been provided for changing the type of plastic, changing the source of electricity generation, and reducing waste by using recycled raw materials in order to make flexible packaging more environmentally beneficial.
Reference25 articles.
1. Plastic packaging goes sustainable: An analysis of consumer preferences for plastic water bottles;Pigliafreddo;Environ. Sci. Policy,2020
2. (2024, February 03). Plastic the Facts, Plastics Europe Website, Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-fast-facts-2023/.
3. (2023, June 12). Turkish Plastics Industry Foundation-PAGEV, Turkish Plastics Industry Follow-Up Report. Available online: https://pagev.org/turkish-plastics-industry-follow-up-report-2022.
4. (2024, February 03). Plastic the Facts, Plastics Europe Website, Brussels, Belgium. Available online: https://plasticseurope.org/knowledge-hub/plastics-the-facts-2022/.
5. Processing of flexible plastic packaging waste into pyrolysis oil and multi-walled carbon nanotubes for electrocatalytic oxygen reduction;Veksha;J. Hazard. Mater.,2020
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献