Recovering Power Grids Using Strategies Based on Network Metrics and Greedy Algorithms

Author:

Wang Fenghua1ORCID,Cetinay Hale2,He Zhidong3,Liu Le1,Van Mieghem Piet1,Kooij Robert E.14

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Electrical Engineering, Mathematics and Computer Science, Delft University of Technology, 2628 CD Delft, The Netherlands

2. Asset Management, System Insights and Advanced Analytics, Stedin, 3011 TA Rotterdam, The Netherlands

3. DS Information Technology Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200032, China

4. Unit ICT, Strategy and Policy, Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research (TNO), 2595 DA Den Haag, The Netherlands

Abstract

For this study, we investigated efficient strategies for the recovery of individual links in power grids governed by the direct current (DC) power flow model, under random link failures. Our primary objective was to explore the efficacy of recovering failed links based solely on topological network metrics. In total, we considered 13 recovery strategies, which encompassed 2 strategies based on link centrality values (link betweenness and link flow betweenness), 8 strategies based on the products of node centrality values at link endpoints (degree, eigenvector, weighted eigenvector, closeness, electrical closeness, weighted electrical closeness, zeta vector, and weighted zeta vector), and 2 heuristic strategies (greedy recovery and two-step greedy recovery), in addition to the random recovery strategy. To evaluate the performance of these proposed strategies, we conducted simulations on three distinct power systems: the IEEE 30, IEEE 39, and IEEE 118 systems. Our findings revealed several key insights: Firstly, there were notable variations in the performance of the recovery strategies based on topological network metrics across different power systems. Secondly, all such strategies exhibited inferior performance when compared to the heuristic recovery strategies. Thirdly, the two-step greedy recovery strategy consistently outperformed the others, with the greedy recovery strategy ranking second. Based on our results, we conclude that relying solely on a single metric for the development of a recovery strategy is insufficient when restoring power grids following link failures. By comparison, recovery strategies employing greedy algorithms prove to be more effective choices.

Funder

China Scholarship Council

Shanghai Science and Technology “Rising-Star” Program

European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Physics and Astronomy

Reference36 articles.

1. Seismic safety evaluation of electric power supply at urban level;Nuti;Earthq. Eng. Struct. Dyn.,2007

2. Zhou, X., and Yan, C. (2008, January 20–24). A blackout in Hainan Island power system: Causes and restoration procedure. Proceedings of the 2008 IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting-Conversion and Delivery of Electrical Energy in the 21st Century, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

3. A systematic review on power system resilience from the perspective of generation, network, and load;Wang;Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev.,2022

4. Muir, A., and Lopatto, J. (2004). Final Report on the August 14, 2003 Blackout in the United States and Canada: Causes and Recommendations, Technical Report.

5. LaCommare, K.H., and Eto, J.H. (2004). Understanding the Cost of Power Interruptions to US Electricity Consumers, Lawrence Berkeley National Lab. (LBNL). Technical Report.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3