Associations between Ethnicity and Referrals, Access and Engagement in a UK Adult Burns Clinical Psychology Service

Author:

Shepherd Laura1ORCID,Hari Ishani2,Bamford Lauren3

Affiliation:

1. Department of Clinical Psychology & Neuropsychology, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

2. Academic Neuroscience Department, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Derby Road, Nottingham NG7 2UH, UK

3. Department of Neuroscience, Psychology and Behaviour, George Davies Centre, University of Leicester, Lancaster Road, Leicester LE1 7HA, UK

Abstract

Ethnic inequalities exist across healthcare, including access to and experiences and outcomes of mental health services. Access to and engagement with burns clinical psychology services is essential for all patients. This study aimed to explore the ethnic diversity of adults referred to a burns clinical psychology service compared to those admitted to the burns service. It also aimed to investigate associations between ethnicity and indicators of access and engagement (receiving, declining or not attending psychological assessments, receiving psychological therapy and the number of therapy sessions completed). Routinely collected data over eight years were analysed. Analysis revealed an association between ethnicity and referral to the burns clinical psychology service. Patients from White British and Other ethnic backgrounds were less likely to be referred, whereas patients from Black and Asian ethnic groups were more likely to be referred. There were no statistically significant associations between ethnicity and receiving, declining or not attending psychological assessments or receiving psychological therapy. Furthermore, there was no statistically significant difference in the number of psychological therapy sessions received between the ethnic groups. Therefore, patients from ethnic minority groups did not appear to have significant difficulties engaging with the service but further research is recommended.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

General Medicine

Reference28 articles.

1. Defining ethnicity;Baumann;SAA Archaeol. Rec.,2004

2. Researching ethnic diversity in the British NHS: Methodological and practical concerns;Gerrish;J. Adv. Nurs.,2000

3. Kapadia, D., Zhang, J., Salway, S., Nazroo, J., Booth, A., Villarroel-Williams, N., Becares, L., and Esmail, A. (2023, February 08). Ethnic Inequalities in Healthcare: A Rapid Evidence Review. Available online: https://www.nhsrho.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/RHO-Rapid-Review-Final-Report_v.7.pdf.

4. Exploring ethnic minority women’s experiences of maternity care during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic: A qualitative study;John;BMJ Open,2021

5. “Crazy person is crazy person. It doesn’t differentiate”: An exploration into Somali views of mental health and access to healthcare in an established UK Somali community;Linney;Int. J. Equity Health,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3