Study on Biomass Models of Artificial Young Forest in the Northwestern Alpine Region of China

Abstract

The artificial young forest is an important component of ecosystems, and biomass models are important for estimating the carbon storage of ecosystems. However, research on biomass models of the young forest is lacking. In this study, biomass data of 96 saplings of three tree species from the southern foot of the Qilian Mountains were collected. These data, coupled with allometric growth equations and the nonlinear joint estimation method, were used to establish independent, component-additive, and total-control compatible models to estimate the biomass of artificial young wood of Picea crassifolia (Picea crassifolia Kom.), Sabina przewalskii (Sabina przewalskii Kom.), and Pinus tabulaeformis (Pinus tabuliformis Carr.). The distribution characteristics of the biomass components (branch, leaf, trunk, and root biomass) and the goodness of fit of the models were also analyzed. The results showed that (1) the multiple regression models with two independent variables (MRWTIV) were superior to the univariate models for all three tree species. Base diameter was the best-fitting variable of the univariate model for Picea crassifolia and Pinus tabulaeformis, and the addition of base diameter and crown diameter as variables to the MRWTIV can significantly improve model accuracy. Tree height was the best-fitting variable of the univariate model of Sabina przewalskii, and the addition of tree height and crown diameter to the MRWTIV can significantly improve model accuracy; (2) the two independent variable component-additive compatible model was the best-fitting biomass model. The compatible models constructed by the nonlinear joint estimation method were less accurate than the independent models. However, they maintained good compatibility among the biomass components and enabled more robust estimates of regional biomass; and (3) for the young wood of Picea crassifolia, Sabina przewalskii, and Pinus tabulaeformis, the aboveground biomass ratio of each component to total biomass was highest for leaf biomass (26%–68%), followed by branch (10%–46%) and trunk (11%–55%) biomass, and the aboveground biomass was higher than the underground biomass. In conclusion, the optimal biomass model of artificial young forest at the sampling site is a multivariate component-additive compatible biomass model. It can well estimate the biomass of young forest and provide a basis for future research.