Abstract
Online community and citizen science (CCS) projects have broadened access to scientific research and enabled different forms of participation in biodiversity research; however, little is known about whether and how such opportunities are taken up by young people (aged 5–19). Furthermore, when they do participate, there is little research on whether their online activity makes a tangible contribution to scientific research. We addressed these knowledge gaps using quantitative analytical approaches and visualisations to investigate 249 youths’ contributions to CCS on the iNaturalist platform, and the potential for the scientific use of their contributions. We found that nearly all the young volunteers’ observations were ‘verifiable’ (included a photo, location, and date/time) and therefore potentially useful to biodiversity research. Furthermore, more than half were designated as ‘Research Grade’, with a community agreed-upon identification, making them more valuable and accessible to biodiversity science researchers. Our findings show that young volunteers with lasting participation on the platform and those aged 16–19 years are more likely to have a higher proportion of Research Grade observations than younger, or more ephemeral participants. This study enhances our understanding of young volunteers’ contributions to biodiversity research, as well as the important role professional scientists and data users can play in helping verify youths’ contributions to make them more accessible for biodiversity research.
Funder
Wellcome Trust
Economic and Social Research Council
National Science Foundation
Subject
Nature and Landscape Conservation,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Ecological Modeling,Ecology
Reference43 articles.
1. Youth-focused citizen science: Examining the role of environmental science learning and agency for conservation
2. Citizen Science: Expertise, Democracy, and Public Participationmoz-extension://ca68d40e-73e2-9049-bef2-82163c09d4e3/enhanced-reader.html?openApp&pdf=https%3A%2F%2Fdiscovery.ucl.ac.uk%2Fid%2Feprint%2F10062223%2F1%2FPolicy_Analysis_SSC_1_2018_Citizen_Science_WEB.pdf
3. Shifting Subject Positions
4. Flowers of Resistance: Citizen science, ecological democracy and the transgressive education paradigm;Wals,2017
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献