Abstract
There are currently no clear guidelines in the US and some other countries regarding euthanasia decision making timelines for dairy cattle that become injured or ill to the extent that recovery is unlikely or impossible. Our study aimed to identify decision making criteria and the most common factors considered when making and carrying out euthanasia decisions. Dairy producers were recruited to participate in a mailed survey (Part I, 307 completed surveys were returned) or in one of three focus groups (Part II, 8–10 producers/group, n = 24). Part I (survey): Farm owners were most commonly responsible for on-farm euthanasia and most respondents would treat and monitor compromised cattle for a majority of 15 health conditions. Responses were highly variable; for example, 6.3% and 11.7% of respondents would never euthanize a non-ambulatory cow or calf, respectively. Part II (focus groups): Three main themes (animal, human, and farm operation) were identified from discussion which focused primarily on animal welfare (16% of the discussion) and human psychology (16%). Participants expressed a desire to eliminate animal suffering by euthanizing, alongside a wide range of emotional states. Development of specific standards for euthanasia is a critical next step and more research is needed to understand the human emotions surrounding euthanasia decision making.
Funder
U.S. Department of Agriculture
Subject
General Veterinary,Animal Science and Zoology
Reference28 articles.
1. Cow, Farm, and Management Factors During the Dry Period that Determine the Rate of Clinical Mastitis After Calving
2. Euthanasia Techniques for Dairy Cattle
3. Farmer’s Assuring Responsible Management Programhttps://nationaldairyfarm.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/transportationguidelines-2019.pdf
4. Practical Euthanasia of Cattle,2013
5. Managing Emotions in an Animal Shelter;Arluke,1994
Cited by
21 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献