A Critical Review of Developers’ Decision Criteria for Brownfield Regeneration: Development of the BRIC Index

Author:

Okeyinka Oriyomi Modupe1ORCID,Khan Rana1ORCID,Pathirage Chaminda1ORCID,Mahammedi Charf El Dine1,West Antony1

Affiliation:

1. Brownfield Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton WV10 0JP, UK

Abstract

The complexity of processes and constraints associated with redevelopment of brownfield lands calls for provision of relevant, adequate, sufficient, up-to-date, and easily accessible information on brownfield lands to enable developers make an informed decision when navigating the hurdles of brownfield redevelopment. Furthermore, the various obstacles and barriers that developers encounter during decision making for brownfield redevelopment has continued to contribute to the limited uptake of brownfield lands in England by developers for redevelopment and regeneration. This study was conducted to explore the factors that developers consider when redeveloping brownfield lands and to present a decision criterion that will support brownfield site selection and subsequent regeneration. A mixed methodology using qualitative and quantitative approaches was adopted to investigate the factors, criteria, and information that developers consider when making decisions for brownfield redevelopment. Data collection was carried out using a literature review and interviews with brownfield experts. Using a purposeful sampling approach, a total of 11 brownfield stakeholders, which cut across key experts involved in brownfield redevelopment within the Black Country region of England, was interviewed. Each expert interviewed holds a stakeholder critical role in regulatory organisations and construction industry organisations, including local authorities, geo-environmental organisations, land remediators and consultants, housing developers, etc. A comparative analysis of evidence obtained from developer interview responses, the literature review, and the brownfield register showed that 57% of factors, criteria, and information such as cost/capital expenses, funding, contamination level, infrastructure, water risk, neighbours, connectivity (digital, energy networks/grid), and access and transport, which developers require for decision making relating to redevelopment of brownfield sites, are not available on a standard local authority’s brownfield land register. To address the identified information gaps, this study developed “The BRIC Index”, a decision-making tool that incorporates a GIS-based system to facilitate screening of brownfield sites based on specified criteria and to help identify risks, contamination, and remediation costs of brownfield development. The effectiveness of the BRIC Index was validated through successful usage for site selection by various SMEs in the Black Country.

Funder

the European Regional Development Fund

Publisher

MDPI AG

Subject

Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law,Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment,Geography, Planning and Development,Building and Construction

Reference53 articles.

1. Industrial Revolution and the Change of Landscape in Modern England;Wenyuan;J. Landsc. Res.,2019

2. (2022, December 01). UK Trade & Investment Is the Government Department Land Remediation—Bringing Brownfield Sites Back to Use, Available online: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/425619/UKTI_Land_Remediation_REV1.pdf.

3. (2022, December 01). Campaign to Protec Rural England, (CPRE) Recycling Our Land: State of Brownfield 2021. Available online: https://www.cpre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/Nov-2021_CPRE_Recycling-our-land_brownfields-report.pdf.

4. Campaign to Protect Rural England (CPRE) (2023, January 26). State of Brownfield 2022. Available online: https://www.cpre.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2022/12/State-of-Brownfield-2022-FINAL-FORMATTED-15-12-2022.pdf.

5. The determinants of brownfields redevelopment in England;Longo;Environ. Resour. Econ.,2017

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3