Impact of Inverse Manganese Promotion on Silica-Supported Cobalt Catalysts for Long-Chain Hydrocarbons via Fischer–Tropsch Synthesis
-
Published:2024-09-09
Issue:3
Volume:5
Page:607-622
-
ISSN:2624-781X
-
Container-title:Reactions
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Reactions
Author:
Thibanyane Ntebogang1, Gorimbo Joshua1, Yao Yali1
Affiliation:
1. Institute of Catalysis and Energy Solutions (ICES), College of Science, Engineering and Technology, University of South Africa (UNISA), Florida Campus, Private Bag X6, Johannesburg 1710, South Africa
Abstract
One of the challenges in Fischer–Tropsch synthesis (FTS) is the high reduction temperatures, which cause sintering and the formation of silicates. These lead to pore blockages and the coverage of active metals, particularly in conventional catalyst promotion. To address the challenge, this article investigates the effects of the preparation method, specifically the inverse promotion of SiO2-supported Co catalysts with manganese (Mn), and their reduction in H2 for FTS. The catalysts were prepared using stepwise incipient wetness impregnation of a cobalt nitrate precursor into a promoted silica support. The properties of the catalysts were characterized using XRD, XPS, TPR, and BET techniques. The structure–performance relationship of the inversely promoted catalysts in FTS was studied using a fixed-bed reactor to obtain the best performing catalysts for heavy hydrocarbons (C5+). XRD and XPS results indicated that Co3O4 is the dominant cobalt phase in oxidized catalysts. It was found that with increase in Mn loading, the reduction temperature increased in the following sequence 10%Co/SiO2 < 10%Co/0.25%Mn-SiO2 < 10%Co/0.5%Mn-SiO2 < 10%Co/3.0%Mn-SiO2. The catalyst with the lowest Mn loading, 10%Co/0.25%Mn-SiO2, exhibited higher C5+ selectivity, which can be attributed to less MSI and higher reducibility. This catalyst showed the lowest CH4 selectivity possibly due to lower H2 uptake and higher CO chemisorption.
Funder
University of South Africa
Reference67 articles.
1. Potgieter, J.H., Moodley, D., Botha, T., Visagie, J., Manong, T., Frank, M., Claeys, M., van Steen, E., Böltken, T., and Pfeifer, P. (2024). Development of promoted cobalt/alumina Fischer-Tropsch catalysts for increased activity and selectivity: Micro-reactor to piloting scale. Catal. Today, 432. 2. Moodley, D.J. (2008). On the Deactivation of Cobalt-based Fischer-Tropsch Synthesis Catalysts. [Ph.D. Thesis, Chemical Engineering and Chemistry, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven]. 3. Gupta, S., Fernandes, R., Patel, R., Spreitzer, M., and Patel, N. (2023). A review of cobalt-based catalysts for sustainable energy and environmental applications. Appl. Catal. A Gen., 661. 4. Insight into the Physicochemical Properties of Co-Based Catalysts in Fischer—Tropsch Synthesis;Shiba;Reactions,2023 5. Okoye-Chine, C.G., Moyo, M., and Hildebrandt, D. (2021). The effect of hydrophobicity on SiO2–supported Co catalysts in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis. Fuel, 296.
|
|