Conceptualization of Depression among Medical Students and Its Differences during Medical Education

Author:

Arana-Ballestar Santi1ORCID,Campos-Ródenas Ricardo2,Olaya Beatriz34ORCID,Santabárbara Javier5ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Centro de Salud Parque Goya, 50018 Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain

2. Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, 50009 Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain

3. Research, Innovation and Teaching Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, 08950 Sant Boi de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain

4. Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), 28029 Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain

5. Faculty of Medicine, University of Zaragoza, 50009 Zaragoza, Aragón, Spain

Abstract

The definition of mental disorders has been traditionally a matter of discussion, and it has relevant implications in research and healthcare. Our aim was to explore the conceptualization medical students have of depression and to determine differences across academic years. The Maudsley Attitudes Questionnaire was adapted through a double translation, double back-translation and a preliminary validation, obtaining a Spanish edition. All students of the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Zaragoza and doctors who graduated from this University in 2020 were invited to answer the online questionnaire, and we received 222 answers (response rate: 15.2%). The results were compared by years and levels of education using an ANOVA. The social realist, behavioral, biological, cognitive and psychodynamic models were the most endorsed. The psychodynamic and nihilist models were less embraced by students in later educational years. These students also reported greater confidence in their understanding of depression and of its biological, cognitive and behavioral models. In conclusion, the conceptualization of depression among medical students is complex and multidimensional, and appears to be similar across different years of education. In later years, we found less support for the psychodynamic model, increased confidence in psychiatry and greater ease in handling the concepts of its leading models.

Funder

Instituto de Salud Carlos III

Publisher

MDPI AG

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3