Cancer-Related Pain Management in Suitable Intrathecal Therapy Candidates: A Spanish Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus

Author:

Pérez Concha1ORCID,Quintanar Teresa2ORCID,García Carmen3,Cuervo Miguel Ángel4ORCID,Goberna María Jesús5,Monleón Manuela6,González Ana I.7,Lizán Luís8ORCID,Comellas Marta8ORCID,Álvarez María9,Peña Isaac10

Affiliation:

1. Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, 28006 Madrid, Spain

2. Hospital General Universitario de Elche, 03203 Elche, Spain

3. Unidad de Continuidad Asistencial, Servicio Madrileño de Salud, 28046 Madrid, Spain

4. Hospital Universitario de Badajoz, 06080 Badejoz, Spain

5. Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, 36204 Vigo, Spain

6. Equipo de Soporte de Atención Domiciliaria de Legazpi, 28045 Madrid, Spain

7. Asociación Española Contra el Cáncer (AECC), 28045 Madrid, Spain

8. Outcomes’10, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Jaume I, 12071 Castellón, Spain

9. Health Economics & Outcomes Research Unit, Medtronic Ibérica, S.A., 28050 Madrid, Spain

10. Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio, 41013 Sevilla, Spain

Abstract

A consensus is needed among healthcare professionals involved in easing oncological pain in patients who are suitable candidates for intrathecal therapy. A Delphi consultation was conducted, guided by a multidisciplinary scientific committee. The 18-item study questionnaire was designed based on a literature review together with a discussion group. The first-round questionnaire assessed experts’ opinion of the current general practice, as well as their recommendation and treatment feasibility in the near future (2–3-year period) using a 9-point Likert scale. Items for which consensus was not achieved were included in a second round. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement (1–3 or 7–9). A total of 67 panelists (response rate: 63.2%) and 62 (92.5%) answered the first and second Delphi rounds, respectively. The participants were healthcare professionals from multiple medical disciplines who had an average of 17.6 (7.8) years of professional experience. A consensus was achieved on the recommendations (100%). The actions considered feasible to implement in the short term included effective multidisciplinary coordination, improvement in communication among the parties, and an assessment of patient satisfaction. Efforts should focus on overcoming the barriers identified, eventually leading to the provision of more comprehensive care and consideration of the patient’s perspective.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference28 articles.

1. Update on Prevalence of Pain in Patients with Cancer 2022: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis;Snijders;Cancers,2023

2. Management of cancer symptoms: Pain, depression, and fatigue;Carr;Evid. Rep. Technol. Assess.,2002

3. SEOM clinical guideline for treatment of cancer pain (2017);Jara;Clin. Transl. Oncol.,2018

4. Have We Improved Pain Control in Cancer Patients? A Multicenter Study of Ambulatory and Hospitalized Cancer Patients;Vallano;J. Palliat. Med.,2015

5. WHO (2018). WHO Guidelines for the Pharmacological and Radiotherapeutic Management of Cancer Pain in Adults and Adolescents, WHO Guidelines Approved by the Guidelines Review Committee.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3