Shifting Paradigms in TNBC Treatment: Emerging Alternatives to Capecitabine in the Post-Neoadjuvant Setting

Author:

Abahssain Halima12ORCID,Souadka Amine234,Alem Rania15,Santoni Matteo6,Battelli Nicola6,Amela Eric1,Lemaire Antoine7ORCID,Rodriguez Joseph7,Errihani Hassan25

Affiliation:

1. Oncology and Medical Specialties Department, Valenciennes General Hospital, 59300 Valenciennes, France

2. Equipe de Recherche en Oncologie Translationnelle (EROT), University Mohammed V in Rabat, Rabat 8007, Morocco

3. Surgical Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, University Mohammed V in Rabat, Rabat 8007, Morocco

4. Centre d’Investigation Clinique, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Ibn Sina, Rabat 6527, Morocco

5. Oncology Department, National Institute of Oncology, University Mohammed V in Rabat, Rabat 8007, Morocco

6. Oncology Unit, Macerata Hospital, 62100 Macerata, Italy

7. Supportive Care Department, Valenciennes General Hospital, 59300 Valenciennes, France

Abstract

Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) remains a clinically challenging subtype due to its aggressive nature and limited treatment options post-neoadjuvant failure. Historically, capecitabine has been the cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for TNBC patients not achieving a pathological complete response (pCR). However, the integration of new modalities such as immunotherapy and PARP inhibitors has prompted a re-evaluation of traditional post-neoadjuvant approaches. Methods: This review synthesizes data from pivotal clinical trials and meta-analyses to evaluate the efficacy of emerging therapies in the post-neoadjuvant setting. We focus on the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), PARP inhibitors (PARPis), and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) alongside or in place of capecitabine in TNBC treatment paradigms. Results: The addition of ICIs like pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant regimens has shown increased pCR rates and improved event-free survival, posing new questions about optimal post-neoadjuvant therapies. Similarly, PARPis have demonstrated efficacy in BRCA-mutated TNBC populations, with significant improvements in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Emerging studies on ADCs further complicate the adjuvant landscape, offering potentially efficacious alternatives to capecitabine, especially in patients with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy. Discussion: The challenge remains to integrate these new treatments into clinical practice effectively, considering factors such as drug resistance, patient-specific characteristics, and socio-economic barriers. This review discusses the implications of these therapies and suggests a future direction focused on personalized medicine approaches in TNBC. Conclusions: As the treatment landscape for TNBC evolves, the role of capecitabine is being critically examined. While it remains a viable option for certain patient groups, the introduction of ICIs, PARPis, and ADCs offers promising alternatives that could redefine adjuvant therapy standards. Ongoing and future trials will be pivotal in determining the optimal therapeutic strategies for TNBC patients with residual disease post-neoadjuvant therapy.

Funder

“Cancer Research Institute IRC”, Kingdom of Morocco

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

1. Breast cancer;Harbeck;Lancet,2017

2. Definition and impact of pathologic complete response on prognosis after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in various intrinsic breast cancer subtypes;Untch;J. Clin. Oncol.,2012

3. Pathological complete response and long-term clinical benefit in breast cancer: The CTNeoBC pooled analysis;Cortazar;Lancet,2014

4. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up;Loibl;Ann. Oncol.,2024

5. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group (EBCTCG) (2019). Increasing the dose intensity of chemotherapy by more frequent administration or sequential scheduling: A patient-level meta-analysis of 37,298 women with early breast cancer in 26 randomised trials. Lancet, 393, 1440–1452.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3