Comparison of Weekly Paclitaxel Regimens in Recurrent Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer: A Single Institution Retrospective Study

Author:

Morin Laurence1ORCID,Grenier Louis-Philippe2ORCID,Foucault Nicolas3,Lévesque Éric1,Fabi François4,Langlais Eve-Lyne5,Sebastianelli Alexandra5,Lavoie Marianne1,Lalancette Marc1,Plante Marie5ORCID,Singbo Mahukpe6,Castonguay Vincent1

Affiliation:

1. Medical Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1J 5B3, Canada

2. Medical Oncology Pharmacy Department, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1J 5B3, Canada

3. Pharmacy Department, Unité de Formation et de Recherche en Santé de Rouen, 76183 Normandie, France

4. Radio-Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1J 5B3, Canada

5. Gynecologic Oncology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1J 5B3, Canada

6. Centre de Recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Québec-Université Laval, Québec, QC G1E 6W2, Canada

Abstract

Weekly paclitaxel (WP) is a chemotherapeutic cornerstone in the management of patients with platinum-resistant ovarian carcinoma. Multiple WP dosing regimens have been used clinically and studied individually. However, no formal comparison of these regimens is available to provide objective guidance in clinical decision making. The primary objective of this study was to compare the cumulative dose of paclitaxel delivered using 80 mg/m2/week, administered using either a 3 weeks out of 4 (WP3) or a 4 weeks out of 4 (WP4) regimen. The secondary objective was to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with both regimens, including efficacy and toxicity parameters. Our retrospective cohort comprised 149 patients harboring platinum-resistant ovarian cancer treated at the CHU de Québec from January 2012 to January 2023. WP3 and WP4 reached a similar cumulative dose (1353.7 vs. 1404.2 mg/m2; p = 0.29). No significant differences in the clinical outcomes were observed. The frequency of dose reduction was significantly higher for WP4 than WP3 (44.7% vs. 4.9%; p < 0.01), mainly due to treatment intolerance from toxicity (34.0% vs. 3.9%; p < 0.01). Our data suggest that a WP3 regimen delivers a similar cumulative dose to WP4, hence offering a better tolerability profile without compromising efficacy.

Funder

consolidated funds for clinical research of the Hematology-Oncology department at the CHU de Québec

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference20 articles.

1. Canadian Cancer Statistics Advisory Committee (2023). Canadian Cancer Statistics 2023, Canadian Cancer Society.

2. Cancer statistics, 2024;Siegel;CA Cancer J. Clin.,2024

3. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (2024, July 01). NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology—Ovarian Cancer. Available online: https://www.nccn.org/patients/guidelines/content/PDF/ovarian-patient.pdf.

4. Tumor evolution and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer;Kim;NPJ Precis. Oncol.,2018

5. Chemoresistance in ovarian cancer: Exploiting cancer stem cell metabolism;Li;J. Gynecol. Oncol.,2018

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3