Impact of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy with Single Layer versus Double Layer Renorrhaphy on Postoperative Renal Function
-
Published:2024-05-13
Issue:5
Volume:31
Page:2758-2768
-
ISSN:1718-7729
-
Container-title:Current Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Current Oncology
Author:
Ito Hiroyuki1, Nakane Keita1, Hagiwara Noriyasu23, Kawase Makoto1ORCID, Kato Daiki1, Iinuma Koji1, Ishida Kenichiro3, Enomoto Torai1, Nezasa Minori3, Tobisawa Yuki1, Ito Takayasu4ORCID, Koie Takuya1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Urology, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan 2. JA Gifu Koseiren Seino Kosei Hospital, Gifu 5010532, Japan 3. Department of Urology, Matsunami General Hospital, Gifu 5016062, Japan 4. Center for Clinical Training and Career Development, Gifu University Graduate School of Medicine, Gifu 5011194, Japan
Abstract
We aimed to investigate the differences in renal function between patients who underwent single inner-layer renorrhaphy (SILR) or double-layer renorrhaphy (DLR) among those with renal tumors who underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). This retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted between November 2018 and October 2023 at two institutions and included patients who underwent RAPN. In total, 93 eligible patients who underwent RAPN were analyzed. Preoperative renal function and prevalence of chronic kidney disease were not significantly different between the two groups. Although urinary leakage was observed in three patients (5.9%) in the SILR group, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding surgical outcomes (p = 0.249). Serum creatinine levels after RAPN were significantly lower in the SILR group than in the DLR group on postoperative days 1 and 365 following RAPN (p = 0.04). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was significantly lower in the DLR group than in the SILR group only on postoperative day 1; however, there was no significant difference between the two groups thereafter. Multivariate analysis showed that the method of renorrhaphy was not a predictor for maintaining renal function after RAPN even though it was associated with eGFR on postoperative day 1.
Reference32 articles.
1. Reconstruction Techniques after Partial Nephrectomy: Classic vs. Sutureless Approach-A Narrative Review;Curr. Urol. Rep.,2023 2. Brassetti, A., Misuraca, L., Anceschi, U., Bove, A.M., Costantini, M., Ferriero, M.C., Guaglianone, S., Mastroianni, R., Torregiani, G., and Covotta, M. (2023). Sutureless Purely Off-Clamp Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Avoiding Renorrhaphy Does not Jeopardize Surgical and Functional Outcomes. Cancers, 15. 3. Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: Single-layer cortical renorrhaphy is associated with reduced rate of renal artery pseudoaneurysm compared to double-layer renorrhaphy;Ta;J. Robot. Surg.,2023 4. De Backer, P., Peraire Lores, M., Demuynck, M., Piramide, F., Simoens, J., Oosterlinck, T., Bogaert, W., Shan, C.V., Van Regemorter, K., and Wastyn, A. (2023). Surgical Phase Duration in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Surgical Data Science Exploration for Clinical Relevance. Diagnostics, 13. 5. Surgical and functional outcomes of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with cortical renorrhaphy omission;Kubota;Sci. Rep.,2022
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|