Quality of Life Determinants in Patients with Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Questionnaire-Based Study
-
Published:2024-08-26
Issue:9
Volume:31
Page:4940-4954
-
ISSN:1718-7729
-
Container-title:Current Oncology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Current Oncology
Author:
Mittal Chetanya1ORCID, Gupta Hardik1ORCID, Nagpal Chitrakshi2, Sahoo Ranjit K.2, Sharma Aparna3, Gangadharaiah Bharat B.2, Tansir Ghazal2, Panaiyadiyan Sridhar4, Shamim Shamim A.5, Kaushal Seema6, Das Chandan J.7, Haresh Kunhi P.8, Seth Amlesh9, Nayak Brusabhanu9, Batra Atul2ORCID
Affiliation:
1. All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 2. Department of Medical Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 3. Department of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 4. Department of Urology, National Cancer Institute, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 5. Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 6. Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 7. Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 8. Department of Radiation Oncology, Dr. B.R.A. Institute Rotary Cancer Hospital, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India 9. Department of Urology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110029, India
Abstract
Introduction: Prostate cancer is one of the most prevalent malignancies affecting men globally, with a significant impact on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). With the recent therapeutic advancements and improvements in survival, there is a need to understand the determinants of HRQOL in metastatic prostate cancer patients to optimize treatment strategies for quality of life as the number of survivors increases. The aim of this study was to identify clinical variables that affect HRQOL and its domains in patients with metastatic prostate cancer. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional questionnaire-based study in patients diagnosed with metastatic prostate cancer at a tertiary cancer center in India. Baseline clinical features, treatment details, and completed Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy—Prostate (FACT-P), composed of FACT-general (FACT-G) and prostate cancer-specific concerns subscale (PCS) and FACT-P Trial Outcome Index (FACT-P TOI) questionnaires, were collected. The mean total, as well as individual domain scores, were calculated. Additionally, these were stratified by the current treatment being received by patients. Linear regression was used to identify independent factors affecting HRQOL in these patients. Results: Of the 106 enrolled patients, 84 completed the FACT-P questionnaire and were included in the analysis. The median age was 66 years, and at the time of assessment, 3 patients (3.6%) were receiving androgen deprivation therapy only, 53 patients (63.1%) were on ADT + androgen receptor-targeted agents (ARTAs), and 18 patients (21.4%) patients received ADT + chemotherapy. The mean (±standard deviation) of the FACT-P TOI score was 70.33 (±15.16); the PCS subscale was the most affected, followed by functional well-being. Patients on chemotherapy scored significantly higher on PCS, but the composite scores were not significantly different. Univariable regression identified obesity (body mass index > 25 kg/m2) and duration of first-line treatment as significant predictors of better HRQOL; however, obesity was the only independent predictor in multivariable analysis (β = 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 1.2 to 15.0; p = 0.022). Obesity also independently predicted a better FACT-P and its physical well-being domain score and PCS. Conclusion: Prostate cancer patients experience impaired QoL, especially in the prostate cancer-specific and functional well-being domains. Lower BMI is an independent predictor of poor QoL, and this requires efforts to assess the impact of strategies to manage the nutritional status of patients with metastatic disease on QoL outcomes.
Reference36 articles.
1. Ferlay, J., Ervik, M., Lam, F., Colombet, M., Mery, L., Piñeros, M., Znaor, A., Soerjomataram, I., and Bray, F. (2020). Global Cancer Observatory: Cancer Today, International Agency for Research on Cancer. Available online: https://gco.iarc.fr/today. 2. Recent Advances in the Management of Metastatic Prostate Cancer;Sayegh;JCO Oncol. Pract.,2022 3. Leaning, D., Kaur, G., Morgans, A.K., Ghouse, R., Mirante, O., and Chowdhury, S. (2023). Treatment landscape and burden of disease in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Systematic and structured literature reviews. Front. Oncol., 13. 4. Quality of life in chronic disease patients;Megari;Health Psychol. Res.,2013 5. Development, characteristics and validity of the EORTC QLQ-PR25 and the FACT-P for assessment of quality of life in prostate cancer patients;Chu;J. Comp. Eff. Res.,2014
|
|