Surgical Management of Adult Brainstem Gliomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Author:

Ius Tamara1ORCID,Lombardi Giuseppe2ORCID,Baiano Cinzia3,Berardinelli Jacopo3,Romano Andrea4,Montemurro Nicola5ORCID,Cavallo Luigi Maria3,Pasqualetti Francesco6ORCID,Feletti Alberto7

Affiliation:

1. Neurosurgery Unit, Head-Neck and NeuroScience Department, University Hospital of Udine, 33100 Udine, Italy

2. Department of Oncology 1, Veneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy

3. Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy

4. Department of Neuroradiology, NESMOS S.Andrea Hospital, University Sapienza, 00189 Rome, Italy

5. Department of Neurosurgery, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, 56123 Pisa, Italy

6. Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX3 7DQ, UK

7. Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Institute of Neurosurgery, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy

Abstract

The present review aims to investigate the survival and functional outcomes in adult high-grade brainstem gliomas (BGSs) by comparing data from resective surgery and biopsy. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were screened to conduct a systematic review of the literature, according to the PRISMA statement. Analysis was limited to articles including patients older than 18 years of age and those published from 1990 to September 2022. Case reports, review articles, meta-analyses, abstracts, reports of aggregated data, and reports on multimodal therapy where surgery was not the primary treatment were excluded. The ROBINS-I tool was applied to evaluate the risk of bias. Six studies were ultimately considered for the meta-analysis. The resective group was composed of 213 subjects and the bioptic group comprised 125. The analysis demonstrated a survival benefit in those patients in which an extensive resection was possible (STR HR 0.59 (95% CI 0.42, 0.82)) (GTR HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.43, 0.92)). Although surgical resection is associated with increased survival, the significantly higher complication rate makes it difficult to recommend surgery instead of biopsy for BSGs. Future investigations combining volumetric data and molecular profiles could add important data to better define the proper indication between resection and biopsy.

Publisher

MDPI AG

Reference41 articles.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3